Controlled Paraphrase Geometry in Sentence Embedding Space: Local Manifold Modeling and Latent Probing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The paper studies the local geometry of embedding clouds induced by controlled local classes of semantically close sentences. The central question is how controlled paraphrase-like semantic variation is organized in sentence embedding space and whether this local structure can be explicitly modeled by low-degree fitted carriers. We introduce a local geometric modeling scheme based on affine, quadratic, and cubic fitted models. We also use a surface-based latent probing procedure that constructs synthetic latent points in a reduced local PCA space with respect to the fitted carrier. The procedure is intended as an offline method for representation-space analysis, local manifold modeling, and geometry-aware latent probing. Generated latent points are evaluated using criteria that measure consistency with the fitted surface, preservation of neighborhood structure, agreement with the empirical distribution, stability of Hessian-based second-order shape descriptors, and stability of fitted-model coefficients. Experiments on controlled sets of semantically close sentences show that nonlinear local models describe embedding clouds more accurately than affine models. Surface-based generation provides strong fitted-geometry fidelity, including surface consistency, Hessian-based shape consistency, and coefficient consistency. Downstream experiments show that geometric validity of synthetic latent points does not automatically translate into improved classification performance. The results support explicit local geometric modeling of sentence embedding space and highlight the need to distinguish geometric validity from discriminative utility. As a resource contribution, we introduce CoPaGE-300K, a controlled template-based dataset of semantically close sentence variants with slot-level annotations and precomputed sentence embeddings.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 May 2026.
Builds on
20 of 31 references.
References · 20
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
- 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,841
- 2019EDA: Easy Data Augmentation Techniques for Boosting Performance on Text Classification Taskscited by 800
- 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 770
- 2018Contextual Augmentation: Data Augmentation by Words with Paradigmatic Relationscited by 201
- 2018MixUp as Locally Linear Out-Of-Manifold Regularizationcited by 158
- 2017Dataset Augmentation in Feature Spacecited by 124
- 2021A Survey on Data Augmentation for Text Classificationcited by 111
- 2020Parametric UMAP embeddings for representation and semi-supervised learningcited by 103
- 2020How Effective is Task-Agnostic Data Augmentation for Pretrained Transformers?cited by 41
- 2020Multi-SimLex: A Large-Scale Evaluation of Multilingual and Cross-Lingual Lexical Semantic Similaritycited by 38
- 2019Still a Pain in the Neck: Evaluating Text Representations on Lexical Compositioncited by 27
8 more
- 2024Holmes: A Benchmark to Assess the Linguistic Competence of Language Modelscited by 26
- 2019On-manifold Adversarial Data Augmentation Improves Uncertainty Calibrationcited by 18
- 2021Sentence Similarity Based on Contextscited by 12
- 2023TextManiA: Enriching Visual Feature by Text-driven Manifold Augmentationcited by 9
- 2023Collective Human Opinions in Semantic Textual Similaritycited by 8
- 2019Data Augmentation with Manifold Exploring Geometric Transformations for Increased Performance and Robustnesscited by 7
- 2024The Impact of Word Splitting on the Semantic Content of Contextualized Word Representationscited by 6
- 2023Augment on Manifold: Mixup Regularization with UMAPcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.