mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Finite-Sample Analysis of Elimination in Active Hypothesis Testing

arXiv 2605.01039 ↗First posted 1 May 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A fixed-confidence, finite-sample problem of active hypothesis testing arises in many safety-critical applications. Situated in the context of sequential hypothesis testing, this paper studies the effect of hypothesis elimination on the stopping time. We introduce an elimination-augmented Track-and-Stop algorithm, in which champion-specific active-opponent sets are progressively pruned, and sensing effort is reallocated toward the surviving alternatives. Our analysis derives a non-asymptotic upper bound on the expected stopping time. The gain in finite-sample from elimination appears on the scale of the non-leading term, resulting from tighter tracking and concentration constants on the reduced hypothesis set. Furthermore, we introduce an aggressiveness parameter to modulate the trade-off between faster elimination and weaker confidence guarantee. An experimental study on synthetic Gaussian instances confirms the theoretical predictions.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 May 2026.

Builds on

4 of 22 references.

References · 4

  1. 2014On the Complexity of Best Arm Identification in Multi-Armed Bandit Modelscited by 280
  2. 2016Optimal Best Arm Identification with Fixed Confidencecited by 233
  3. 2022On Elimination Strategies for Bandit Fixed-Confidence Identificationcited by 8
  4. 2021Greedy Approximation Algorithms for Active Sequential Hypothesis Testingcited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.