Effect-Transparent Governance for AI Workflow Architectures: Semantic Preservation, Expressive Minimality, and Decidability Boundaries
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present a machine-checked formalization of structurally governed AI workflow architectures and prove that effect-level governance can be imposed without reducing internal computational expressivity. Using Interaction Trees in Rocq 8.19, we define a governance operator G that mediates all effectful directives, including memory access, external calls, and oracle (LLM) queries. Our development compiles with 0 admitted lemmas and consists of 36 modules, ~12,000 lines of Rocq, and 454 theorems. We establishseven properties: (P1) governed Turing completeness, (P2) governed oracle expressivity, (P3) a decidability boundary in which governance predicates are total and closed under Boolean composition while semantic program properties remain non-trivial and undecidable by governance, (P4) goal preservation for permitted executions, (P5) expressive minimality of primitive capabilities (compute, memory, reasoning, external call, observability), (P6) subsumption asymmetry showing structural governance strictly subsumes content-level filtering, and (P7) semantic transparency: on all executions where governance permits, the governed interpretation is observationally equivalent (modulo governance-only events) to the ungoverned interpretation. Together, these results show that governance and computational expressivity are orthogonal dimensions: governance constrains the effect boundary of programs while remaining semantically transparent to internal computation.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 May 2026.
Builds on
8 of 25 references.
References · 8
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,568
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
- 2023Cognitive Architectures for Language Agentscited by 429
- 2024Towards Guaranteed Safe AI: A Framework for Ensuring Robust and Reliable AI Systemscited by 96
- 2019Interaction Trees: Representing Recursive and Impure Programs in Coqcited by 7
- 2026Mechanized Foundations of Structural Governance: Machine-Checked Proofs for Governed Intelligencecited by 5
- 2026The Two Boundaries: Why Behavioral AI Governance Fails Structurallycited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.