mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Equation-Free Digital Twins for Nonlinear Structural Dynamics

arXiv 2605.00950 ↗First posted 1 May 2026eess.SP cs.LG cs.SYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Monitoring high-dimensional engineering structures in extreme environments is limited by non-stationary excitation, nonlinear structural kinematics, and stochastic forcing. Traditional model-based and black-box data-driven methods often struggle to resolve these dynamics in real time, particularly under sensor failure or partial observability. This paper introduces a rank-optimized digital twin framework based on Koopman operator theory, Hankel-matrix embeddings, and dynamic mode decomposition. By lifting operational data into a linear invariant subspace, the method enables autonomous, input-blind reconstruction of structural states without requiring a priori mass or stiffness matrices. The framework is validated on an NREL 5MW spar-buoy floating offshore wind turbine, representing a challenging coupled aero-hydro-servo-elastic system. Results show that the rank-optimized Koopman-Hankel manifold separates structural resonances from deterministic 3P rotor harmonics under colored noise, where standard subspace identification can be unreliable. A rolling-horizon virtual sensing strategy achieves high-fidelity reconstruction at critical structural hotspots, with coefficient of determination greater than 0.95 at 1 Hz data assimilation and accuracy exceeding 0.99 at higher sampling rates. By estimating a physical Lyapunov time of approximately 1.0 s, the study defines the predictability horizon associated with the system information barrier. The proposed framework provides a computationally efficient and resilient digital twin approach for real-time identification and virtual sensing of complex structural dynamics.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 May 2026.

Builds on

9 of 54 references.

References · 9

  1. 2016Linear predictors for nonlinear dynamical systems: Koopman operator meets model predictive controlcited by 134
  2. 2024Weak baselines and reporting biases lead to overoptimism in machine learning for fluid-related partial differential equationscited by 87
  3. 2021Grey-box models for wave loading predictioncited by 13
  4. 2024Deep Operator Learning for High-Fidelity Fluid Flow Field Reconstruction from Sparse Sensor Measurementscited by 8
  5. 2017Dynamic mode decomposition for compressive system identificationcited by 7
  6. 2023Easy attention: A simple attention mechanism for temporal predictions with transformerscited by 3
  7. 2024Analysis, forecasting and system identification of a floating offshore wind turbine using dynamic mode decompositioncited by 3
  8. 2025Data-Assimilated Model-Based Reinforcement Learning for Partially Observed Chaotic Flowscited by 3
  9. 2025A Mechanistic Analysis of Transformers for Dynamical Systemscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.