mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On the explainability of max-plus neural networks

arXiv 2605.00889 ↗First posted 27 Apr 2026cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We investigate the explanability properties of the recently proposed linear-min-max neural networks. At initialization, they can be interpreted as k-medoids with the infinity norm as a distance. Then, they are trained using subgradient descent to better fit the data. The model has been shown to be a universal approximator. Yet, we can trace the decision process because a single most activated neuron is responsible for the value of the output. Using this property, we designed a pixel fragility measure that determines whether changes to a single pixel may be responsible to a change in the classification output. Experiments on the PneumoniaMnist dataset show that this explanation for the output of the neural network compares favorably to SHAP and Integrated Gradient.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Apr 2026.

Builds on

9 of 16 references.

References · 9

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  3. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  4. 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 970
  5. 2021MedMNIST v2 -- A large-scale lightweight benchmark for 2D and 3D biomedical image classificationcited by 682
  6. 2016Grad-CAM: Why did you say that?cited by 159
  7. 2019Morphological Network: How Far Can We Go with Morphological Neurons?cited by 10
  8. 2021Min-Max-Plus Neural Networkscited by 8
  9. 2026Exploiting Subgradient Sparsity in Max-Plus Neural Networkscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.