Selfie-Capture Dynamics as an Auxiliary Signal Against Deepfakes and Injection Attacks for Mobile Identity Verification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Mobile remote identity verification (RIdV) systems are exposed to attacks that manipulate or replace the facial video stream, including presentation attacks, real-time deepfakes, and video injection. Recent European requirements, including ETSI TS 119 461 and CEN/TS 18099, motivate evidence channels beyond camera-based presentation-attack detection. This paper studies whether passive motion traces recorded during selfie capture provide auxiliary evidence for spoof screening and user verification. We introduce CanSelfie, a dataset of 375 bona fide multi-sensor sequences collected at 50 Hz from 30 participants using a commercial mobile RIdV application, together with stationary, handheld, and temporally shifted attack-proxy scenarios. We benchmark 7 multivariate time-series classifiers and 8 whole-series anomaly detectors across sensor configurations and temporal windows. For spoof screening, accelerometer-only ROCKAD obtains 0.00% FRR and 43.8% FAR, while QUANT+3-NN obtains the lowest FAR of 32.0% at 2.37% FRR; both reject all stationary proxies. For same-device and same-session user verification, WEASEL+MUSE reaches 1.07% EER using 9 channels. Raw acceleration is the most informative modality, and closed-set accuracy alone does not imply good verification because threshold calibration depends on score distributions. The findings support selfie-capture motion as a low-friction auxiliary signal, while leaving cross-device, cross-session, and real injection-attack evaluation as necessary next steps. Code and data available at: https://github.com/Ergzar/Selfie-Motion-AD-TSC.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Apr 2026.
Builds on
16 of 51 references.
References · 16
- 2016Time Series Classification from Scratch with Deep Neural Networks: A Strong Baselinecited by 358
- 2019ROCKET: Exceptionally fast and accurate time series classification using random convolutional kernelscited by 336
- 2016LSTM-based Encoder-Decoder for Multi-sensor Anomaly Detectioncited by 213
- 2023Bake off redux: a review and experimental evaluation of recent time series classification algorithmscited by 99
- 2024Deepfake Generation and Detection: A Benchmark and Surveycited by 66
- 2017Multivariate Time Series Classification with WEASEL+MUSEcited by 53
- 2022HYDRA: Competing convolutional kernels for fast and accurate time series classificationcited by 53
- 2024aeon: a Python toolkit for learning from time seriescited by 46
- 2022Seeing is Living? Rethinking the Security of Facial Liveness Verification in the Deepfake Eracited by 26
- 2023Digital Deception: Generative Artificial Intelligence in Social Engineering and Phishingcited by 26
- 2021Random Dilated Shapelet Transform: A New Approach for Time Series Shapeletscited by 22
- 2023QUANT: A Minimalist Interval Method for Time Series Classificationcited by 15
4 more
- 2018Continuous Authentication of Smartphones Based on Application Usagecited by 6
- 2024A large-scale study of performance and equity of commercial remote identity verification technologies across demographicscited by 4
- 2021Review of Face Presentation Attack Detection Competitionscited by 3
- 2025Contrastive Learning for Continuous Touch-Based Authenticationcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.