State Stream Transformer (SST) V2: Parallel Training of Nonlinear Recurrence for Latent Space Reasoning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Current transformers discard their rich latent residual stream between positions, reconstructing latent reasoning context at each new position and leaving potential reasoning capacity untapped. The State Stream Transformer (SST) V2 enables parameter-efficient reasoning in continuous latent space through an FFN-driven nonlinear recurrence at each decoder layer, where latent states are streamed horizontally across the full sequence via a learned blend. This same mechanism supports continuous latent deliberation per position at inference time, dedicating additional FLOPs to exploring abstract reasoning before committing to a token. A two-pass parallel training procedure approximates the sequential recurrence, making co-training computationally practical. Hidden state analysis shows that the state stream facilitates reasoning through sharp, content-dependent reorganisations in continuous latent space; the LM head exposes the resulting latent belief states through the output distribution, while the state stream carries them forward to influence future positions. A learned probe shows that at the first generated token, the latent state already predicts whether the eventual answer will survive or break under additional latent computation for every subsequent position. Co-trained into an existing 27B backbone using only a small dataset of GSM8K examples and evaluated using an oracle to route each question to a depth of one to four recurrent forward passes per token, the SST achieves an architectural capacity bound of 61.11% on out-of-distribution GPQA-Diamond, a +15.15 point gain over a fine-tuning-matched baseline, and cuts that same baseline's remaining GSM8K errors by 46%. Together, these results provide a method for efficiently training a nonlinear recurrence and show that the state stream provides additional reasoning capacity beyond that of an otherwise training-matched transformer.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Apr 2026.
Builds on
33 of 42 references.
References · 33
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2023Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spacescited by 4,718
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
- 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,509
- 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,502
- 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,418
21 more
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
- 2021Efficiently Modeling Long Sequences with Structured State Spacescited by 2,465
- 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameterscited by 1,986
- 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,824
- 2019Root Mean Square Layer Normalizationcited by 1,480
- 2024Training Large Language Models to Reason in a Continuous Latent Spacecited by 797
- 2022Simplified State Space Layers for Sequence Modelingcited by 788
- 2018Universal Transformerscited by 647
- 2019Deep Equilibrium Modelscited by 615
- 2015Sequence Level Training with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 576
- 2024Executable Code Actions Elicit Better LLM Agentscited by 564
- 2016Adaptive Computation Time for Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 506
- 2025Scaling up Test-Time Compute with Latent Reasoning: A Recurrent Depth Approachcited by 415
- 2023Looped Transformers as Programmable Computerscited by 237
- 2025Hierarchical Reasoning Modelcited by 177
- 2019Lipschitz Certificates for Layered Network Structures Driven by Averaged Activation Operatorscited by 55
- 2023Parallelizing non-linear sequential models over the sequence lengthcited by 45
- 2026When More Thinking Hurts: Overthinking in LLM Test-Time Compute Scalingcited by 16
- 2025ParaRNN: Unlocking Parallel Training of Nonlinear RNNs for Large Language Modelscited by 15
- 2026The Hot Mess of AI: How Does Misalignment Scale With Model Intelligence and Task Complexity?cited by 10
- 2025From Thought to Action: How a Hierarchy of Neural Dynamics Supports Language Productioncited by 9
Built on by
Not cited yet.