mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Parameter-Efficient Architectural Modifications for Translation-Invariant CNNs

arXiv 2604.27870 ↗First posted 30 Apr 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are widely assumed to be translation-invariant, yet standard architectures exhibit a startling fragility: even a single-pixel shift can drastically degrade performance due to their reliance on spatially dependent fully connected layers. In this work, we resolve this vulnerability by proposing a lightweight 'Online Architecture' strategy. By strategically inserting Global Average Pooling (GAP) layers at various network depths, we effectively decouple feature recognition from spatial location. Using VGG-16 as a primary case study, we demonstrate that this architectural modification achieves a massive 98% reduction in trainable parameters (from 5.2M to just 82K) and a 90% reduction in total network size (138M to 14M). Despite this drastic pruning, our variants maintain competitive Top-1 accuracy on ImageNet (66.4%) while doubling translational robustness, reducing average relative loss from 0.09 to 0.05. Furthermore, our analysis identifies a fundamental limit to invariance: while GAP resolves macroscopic sensitivity, discrete pooling operations introduce a residual periodic aliasing that prevents perfect pixel-level stability. Finally, we extend these findings to Perceptual Image Quality Assessment (IQA) by integrating our invariant backbones into the LPIPS framework. The resulting metric significantly outperforms the retrained baseline in generalization across the KADID-10k dataset (Spearman 0.89 vs. 0.75) and achieves a near-perfect alignment with human psychophysical response curves on the RAID dataset (Spearman 0.95). These results confirm that enforcing architectural invariance is a far more efficient and biologically plausible path to robustness than traditional data augmentation. Data and code are publicly available. The data and code are publicly available to facilitate validation and further research.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Apr 2026.

Builds on

13 of 27 references.

References · 13

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  4. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
  5. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
  6. 2013Network In Networkcited by 600
  7. 2019Making Convolutional Networks Shift-Invariant Againcited by 390
  8. 2018Why do deep convolutional networks generalize so poorly to small image transformations?cited by 198
  9. 2014Multi-scale Orderless Pooling of Deep Convolutional Activation Featurescited by 38
  10. 2017Quantifying Translation-Invariance in Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 30
  11. 2021Convolutional Neural Networks Are Not Invariant to Translation, but They Can Learn to Becited by 19
  12. 2018In Praise of Artifice Reloaded: Caution with subjective image quality databasescited by 2
1 more
  1. 2024RAID-Database: human Responses to Affine Image Distortionscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.