Consumer Attitudes Towards AI in Digital Health: A Mixed-Methods Survey in Australia
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
AI applications are increasingly being introduced into digital health. While technical performance has advanced rapidly, successful deployment mainly depends on consumer attitudes, especially to patient-facing applications. However, most existing research examines consumer attitudes towards healthcare AI at an abstract level rather than in response to concrete artefacts. We report a mixed-methods survey study in Australia (N=275) examining consumer readiness, acceptance, trust, and risk perceptions of healthcare AI, combined with a scenario-based evaluation of an AI-generated versus clinician-written consultation summary. Participants expressed moderate optimism and strong perceived usefulness and ease of use, but also substantial concerns about accuracy, safety, and data use. In the scenario task, the AI-generated summary was strongly preferred for quality, empathy, and overall usefulness, yet identification of the AI summary was near chance. Findings show that consumers judge AI through concrete communication quality and visible human governance, underscoring the need for clinically supervised deployment frameworks beyond technical performance alone.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Apr 2026.
Builds on
3 of 39 references.
References · 3
- 2023FUTURE-AI: International consensus guideline for trustworthy and deployable artificial intelligence in healthcarecited by 60
- 2024Guiding Principles for Using Mixed Methods Research in Software Engineeringcited by 4
- 2025From Framework to Practice: Designing a Real-World Telehealth Application for Palliative Carecited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.