mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

REBENCH: A Procedural, Fair-by-Construction Benchmark for LLMs on Stripped-Binary Types and Names (Extended Version)

arXiv 2604.27319 ↗First posted 30 Apr 2026cs.CR cs.LG cs.SEcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in recent years, driving their adoption across a wide range of domains, including computer security. In reverse engineering, LLMs are increasingly applied to critical tasks such as function and variable name recovery and type inference. However, despite the rapid growth of research in this area, progress has been hindered by the absence of a standardized dataset. Existing studies rely on disparate datasets, preprocessing pipelines, and evaluation metrics, making fair comparisons between approaches difficult and obscuring a clear understanding of LLM capabilities in binary analysis. To address these challenges, we present REBench, a comprehensive benchmark dataset for evaluating LLMs on binary reverse engineering tasks. REBench consolidates a superset of existing datasets, comprising hundreds of millions of lines of source code and a diverse collection of binaries spanning multiple architectures and optimization levels. REBench adopts a knowledge-base-driven methodology that stores byte-level stack information to generate ground truth, ensuring that task difficulty is preserved while maintaining universal applicability. This design enables fair evaluation across tasks while avoiding simplifications that could bias results. As a use case, we apply REBench to measure the reverse engineering performance of LLMs and the result demonstrates difficulties in complex tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Apr 2026.

Builds on

13 of 43 references.

References · 13

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  3. 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,418
  4. 2023Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Codecited by 2,139
  5. 2019BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text miningcited by 1,947
  6. 2023WizardCoder: Empowering Code Large Language Models with Evol-Instructcited by 733
  7. 2019ClinicalBERT: Modeling Clinical Notes and Predicting Hospital Readmissioncited by 493
  8. 2019DIRE: A Neural Approach to Decompiled Identifier Namingcited by 36
  9. 2020Trex: Learning Execution Semantics from Micro-Traces for Binary Similaritycited by 34
  10. 2021Augmenting Decompiler Output with Learned Variable Names and Typescited by 23
  11. 2021Variable Name Recovery in Decompiled Binary Code using Constrained Masked Language Modelingcited by 7
  12. 2019P2IM: Scalable and Hardware-independent Firmware Testing via Automatic Peripheral Interface Modeling (extended version)cited by 5
1 more
  1. 2021How Developers Choose Namescited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.