mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

End-to-End Evaluation and Governance of an EHR-Embedded AI Agent for Clinicians

arXiv 2604.27309 ↗First posted 30 Apr 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Clinical AI systems require not just point-in-time evaluation but continuous governance: the ongoing practice of monitoring, evaluating, iterating, and re-evaluating performance throughout deployment. We present an end-to-end framework of governance that integrates rubric validation, live deployment feedback, technical performance monitoring, and cost tracking, with controlled experimentation gating system changes before deployment. Applied to Hyperscribe, an EHR-embedded agent that converts ambient audio into structured chart updates, twenty clinicians authored 1,646 validated rubrics across 823 cases. Seven Hyperscribe versions were evaluated through controlled experiments, with median scores improving from 84% to 95%. Analysis of 107 live feedback entries over three months showed feedback composition shifting from 79% error reports and 14% positive observations to 30% errors and 45% positive observations as engineering interventions resolved failures. Median processing time per audio segment was 8.1 seconds with a 99.6% effective completion rate after retry mechanisms absorbed transient model errors. These results demonstrate that continuous, multi-channel governance of deployed clinical AI is both achievable and effective.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Apr 2026.

Builds on

2 of 18 references.

References · 2

  1. 2024A Framework for Human Evaluation of Large Language Models in Healthcare Derived from Literature Reviewcited by 65
  2. 2026Case-Specific Rubrics for Clinical AI Evaluation: Methodology, Validation, and LLM-Clinician Agreement Across 823 Encounterscited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.