StratMem-Bench: Evaluating Strategic Memory Use in Virtual Character Conversation Beyond Factual Recall
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Achieving realistic human-like conversation for virtual characters requires not only a simple memorization and recall of past events, but also the strategic utilization of memory to meet factual needs and social engagement. Current memory utilization relevant (e.g., memory-augmented generation, long-term dialogue, and etc.) benchmarks overlook this nuance, treating memory primarily as a static repository of facts rather than a dynamic resource to be strategically deployed in dialogues. To address this gap, we design StratMem-Bench, a new benchmark to evaluate strategic memory use in character-centric dialogues. This dataset comprises 657 instances where virtual characters must navigate heterogeneous memory pools containing required, supportive, and irrelevant memories. We also propose a framework with different evaluation metrics including Strict Memory Compliance, Memory Integration Quality, Proactive Enrichment Score and Conditional Irrelevance Rate, to evaluate strategic memory use capabilities of virtual characters. Experiments on StratMem-Bench which leverage the state-of-the-art large language models as virtual characters show that all models perform well at distinguishing between required and irrelevant memories, but struggle once supportive memories are introduced into the decision process.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Apr 2026.
Builds on
13 of 38 references.
References · 13
- 2024Evaluating Very Long-Term Conversational Memory of LLM Agentscited by 800
- 2020SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluationcited by 666
- 2024LongMemEval: Benchmarking Chat Assistants on Long-Term Interactive Memorycited by 656
- 2023Character-LLM: A Trainable Agent for Role-Playingcited by 335
- 2024Self-Preference Bias in LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 248
- 2025Know Me, Respond to Me: Benchmarking LLMs for Dynamic User Profiling and Personalized Responses at Scalecited by 163
- 2024CharacterEval: A Chinese Benchmark for Role-Playing Conversational Agent Evaluationcited by 139
- 2024CheckEval: A reliable LLM-as-a-Judge framework for evaluating text generation using checklistscited by 87
- 2024Crafting Personalized Agents through Retrieval-Augmented Generation on Editable Memory Graphscited by 38
- 2025A Survey of Personalization: From RAG to Agentcited by 26
- 2024How Well Can LLMs Echo Us? Evaluating AI Chatbots' Role-Play Ability with ECHOcited by 19
- 2024MADial-Bench: Towards Real-world Evaluation of Memory-Augmented Dialogue Generationcited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.