mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Quantitative Confirmation of the Currier Language Distinction

arXiv 2604.25979 ↗First posted 28 Apr 2026cs.CR cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present a unified quantitative analysis of the Currier A/B language distinction in the Voynich Manuscript, proceeding in two stages. First, we confirm that the distinction is genuine: a Beta-Binomial mixture model applied to character-pair substitution ratios across 185 folios, without access to Currier's labels, selects 2 by BIC and predicts held-out folio labels at 89% accuracy. Second, we show that the A/B contrast is not primitive but is a low-resolution projection of a higher-dimensional generative system. Its dominant component is a discrete boolean "switch" set once per folio, governing the vowel following the digraphs ch and sh. A two-state binomial mixture achieves Delta AIC = 2,549 over a single-state model and assigns 195 of 197 folios unambiguously. This switch does not operate uniformly: word templates divide into fixed contexts and switchable contexts, with template identity accounting for 92% of variance.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 0 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Apr 2026.

Builds on

0 of 21 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.