Toward a Functional Geometric Algebra for Natural Language Semantics
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Distributional and neural approaches to natural language semantics have been built almost exclusively on conventional linear algebra: vectors, matrices, tensors, and the operations that accompany them. These methods have achieved remarkable empirical success, yet they face persistent structural limitations in compositional semantics, type sensitivity, and interpretability. I argue in this paper that geometric algebra (GA) -- specifically, Clifford algebras -- provides a mathematically superior foundation for semantic representation, and that a Functional Geometric Algebra (FGA) framework extends GA toward a typed, compositional semantics capable of supporting inference, transformation, and interpretability while retaining full compatibility with distributional learning and modern neural architectures. I develop the formal foundations, identify three core capabilities that GA provides and linear algebra does not, present a detailed worked example illustrating operator-level semantic contrasts, and show how GA-based operations already implicit in current transformer architectures can be made explicit and extended. The central claim is not merely increased dimensionality but increased structural organization: GA expands an n-dimensional embedding space into a 2n multivector algebra where base semantic concepts and their higher-order interactions are represented within a single, principled algebraic framework.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Apr 2026.
Builds on
5 of 78 references.
References · 5
- 2026CliffordNet: All You Need is Geometric Algebracited by 7
- 2025Clifford Algebraic Rotor Embeddings : Maybe embeddings should start to CAREcited by 2
- 2026Versor: A Geometric Sequence Architecturecited by 2
- 2024A Novel Spinor-Based Embedding Model for Transformerscited by 1
- 2024Composing or Not Composing? Towards Distributional Construction Grammarscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.