mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

ADEMA: A Knowledge-State Orchestration Architecture for Long-Horizon Knowledge Synthesis with LLMAgents

arXiv 2604.25849 ↗First posted 28 Apr 2026cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Long-horizon LLM tasks often fail not because a single answer is unattainable, but because knowledge states drift across rounds, intermediate commitments remain implicit, and interruption fractures the evolving evidence chain. This paper presents ADEMA as a knowledge-state orchestration architecture for long-horizon knowledge synthesis rather than as a generic multi-agent runtime. The architecture combines explicit epistemic bookkeeping, heterogeneous dual-evaluator governance, adaptive task-mode switching, reputation-shaped resource allocation, checkpoint-resumable persistence, segment-level memory condensation, artifact-first assembly, and final-validity checking with safe fallback. Evidence is drawn entirely from existing materials: a four-scenario showcase package, a fixed 60-run mechanism matrix, targeted micro-ablation and artifact-chain supplements, and a repaired protocol-level benchmark in which code-oriented evaluation is the clearest quality-sensitive mechanism block. Across the fixed matrix, removing checkpoint/resume produced the only invalid run, and it did so in the interruption-sensitive resume condition. By contrast, dual evaluation, segment synthesis, and dynamic governance are best interpreted as supporting control mechanisms that shape trajectory discipline, explicit artifact progression, and cost-quality behavior rather than as universal binary prerequisites for completion. The contribution is therefore a knowledge-state orchestration architecture in which explicit epistemic state transition, evidence-bearing artifact progression, and recoverable continuity are the primary design commitments.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Apr 2026.

Builds on

18 of 24 references.

References · 18

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,502
  2. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,367
  3. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,274
  4. 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,218
  5. 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,945
  6. 2023Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injectioncited by 1,417
  7. 2023CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Societycited by 1,365
  8. 2023HuggingGPT: Solving AI Tasks with ChatGPT and its Friends in Hugging Facecited by 1,180
  9. 2023LongLLMLingua: Accelerating and Enhancing LLMs in Long Context Scenarios via Prompt Compressioncited by 447
  10. 2023Large Language Models for Software Engineering: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 395
  11. 2024A Systematic Survey and Critical Review on Evaluating Large Language Models: Challenges, Limitations, and Recommendationscited by 84
  12. 2025Learning to Generate Structured Output with Schema Reinforcement Learningcited by 27
6 more
  1. 2024Large Language Models for Constructing and Optimizing Machine Learning Workflows: A Surveycited by 19
  2. 2025SLOT: Structuring the Output of Large Language Modelscited by 18
  3. 2025MALLM: Multi-Agent Large Language Models Frameworkcited by 15
  4. 2023Advancing the Search Frontier with AI Agentscited by 12
  5. 2025LLM Agents for Interactive Workflow Provenance: Reference Architecture and Evaluation Methodologycited by 10
  6. 2024How Mature is Requirements Engineering for AI-based Systems? A Systematic Mapping Study on Practices, Challenges, and Future Research Directionscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.