mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CoGReV: A Confidence-Gated Post-Hoc Non-Monotonic Belief Revision Framework for Phishing Website Classification

arXiv 2604.25512 ↗First posted 28 Apr 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In phishing detection, machine learning classifiers act as a first line of defense, but the false positives they produce are triaged by human analysts. The excessive false alarms cause alert fatigue that erodes human oversight. We propose CoGReV, a hybrid framework that augments standard machine learning classifiers with a post-hoc non-monotonic reasoning layer implemented in Answer Set Programming. The layer applies a confidence-gated defeasible rule that revises a phishing prediction toward legitimate only when website metadata is present and the classifier's decision is low-confidence, deferring uncertain predictions to the reasoning layer while leaving out confident decisions to the classifiers. This gating acts as a function-allocation mechanism between the classifier and the reasoning layer. Unlike an ungated rule, which reduces false positives only by discarding genuine detections and degrades phishing recall by about nine percentage points, the proposed gated rule keeps recall within 0.7 percentage points of the no-revision baseline for all classifiers while revising only 0.27 percent of decisions. By lowering false alarms, without sacrificing detection, CoGReV reduces analysts alert fatigue and integrates new domain knowledge into the reasoning layer in O(n) time.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Apr 2026.

Builds on

4 of 16 references.

References · 4

  1. 2017Selective Classification for Deep Neural Networkscited by 799
  2. 2017Multi-shot ASP solving with clingocited by 115
  3. 2020Towards Benchmark Datasets for Machine Learning Based Website Phishing Detection: An experimental studycited by 16
  4. 2019SOK: A Comprehensive Reexamination of Phishing Research from the Security Perspectivecited by 15

Built on by

Not cited yet.