The Structured Output Benchmark: A Multi-Source Benchmark for Evaluating Structured Output Quality in Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models are increasingly being deployed to extract structured data from unstructured and semi-structured sources: parsing invoices, medical records, and converting PDF documents to database entries. Yet existing benchmarks for structured output generation either focus on schema compliance alone, or evaluate value correctness within a single source domain. We introduce SOB (The Structured Output Benchmark), a multi-source benchmark spanning three source modalities: native text, images, and audio conversations. All models receive a text-normalized representation of their context regardless of source modality; this deliberate design isolates structured-output capability from raw vision or speech-processing quality, ensuring a fair, source-agnostic comparison. Our benchmark comprises 5,000 text evaluation records derived from multi-hop QA drawn from a 25,091-record full corpus, 209 image records from OCR-processed PDFs across seven document types including multi-column layouts, dense tables, scanned historical documents, small-print text, and mathematical typesetting, and 115 audio records from the AMI corpus. Each record pairs a natural-language question with a JSON schema that the model must follow and a ground-truth answer verified against the source context. We evaluate 21 frontier and open-weight models across three source domains and seven metrics. Our results reveal a consistent pattern: models achieve near-perfect schema compliance, yet the best Value Accuracy, measured by exact leaf-value match, reaches only 83.0% on text, 67.2% on images, and 23.7% on audio, where longer context makes extraction substantially harder. We release the dataset, evaluation pipeline, and all related code.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Apr 2026.
Builds on
20 of 41 references.
References · 20
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2022Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervisioncited by 3,972
- 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
- 2023MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?cited by 2,105
- 2022ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoningcited by 1,449
- 2020DocVQA: A Dataset for VQA on Document Imagescited by 1,288
- 2020Constructing A Multi-hop QA Dataset for Comprehensive Evaluation of Reasoning Stepscited by 1,259
- 2023FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generationcited by 1,259
- 2023Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 1,143
- 2023SGLang: Efficient Execution of Structured Language Model Programscited by 1,107
- 2021MuSiQue: Multihop Questions via Single-hop Question Compositioncited by 893
- 2021InfographicVQAcited by 430
8 more
- 2023Efficient Guided Generation for Large Language Modelscited by 192
- 2025Generalizing Verifiable Instruction Followingcited by 178
- 2025olmOCR: Unlocking Trillions of Tokens in PDFs with Vision Language Modelscited by 120
- 2023FollowBench: A Multi-level Fine-grained Constraints Following Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 112
- 2024Grammar-Aligned Decodingcited by 54
- 2025StructEval: Benchmarking LLMs' Capabilities to Generate Structural Outputscited by 23
- 2023A Unified View of Evaluation Metrics for Structured Predictioncited by 11
- 2026ExtractBench: A Benchmark and Evaluation Methodology for Complex Structured Extractioncited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Type-Safe Is Not Error-Free: Typed Decision Models Follow the Option Name, Not the Definition Bound to Itcited by 13
- 2026Source-Grounded Data Generation for Text-to-JSON Learningcited by 0
- 2026Evidence-State Reliability Under Controlled Degradation: Parser-Validity Divergence in a Multi-Stage LLM Pipelinecited by 0
- 2026Type-Safe Is Not Error-Free: Typed Decision Models Follow the Option Name, Not the Definition Bound to It22 Sep 2026
- 2026Evidence-State Reliability Under Controlled Degradation: Parser-Validity Divergence in a Multi-Stage LLM Pipeline21 Aug 2026
- 2026Source-Grounded Data Generation for Text-to-JSON Learning18 Jun 2026