mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Structured Output Benchmark: A Multi-Source Benchmark for Evaluating Structured Output Quality in Large Language Models

arXiv 2604.25359 ↗First posted 28 Apr 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models are increasingly being deployed to extract structured data from unstructured and semi-structured sources: parsing invoices, medical records, and converting PDF documents to database entries. Yet existing benchmarks for structured output generation either focus on schema compliance alone, or evaluate value correctness within a single source domain. We introduce SOB (The Structured Output Benchmark), a multi-source benchmark spanning three source modalities: native text, images, and audio conversations. All models receive a text-normalized representation of their context regardless of source modality; this deliberate design isolates structured-output capability from raw vision or speech-processing quality, ensuring a fair, source-agnostic comparison. Our benchmark comprises 5,000 text evaluation records derived from multi-hop QA drawn from a 25,091-record full corpus, 209 image records from OCR-processed PDFs across seven document types including multi-column layouts, dense tables, scanned historical documents, small-print text, and mathematical typesetting, and 115 audio records from the AMI corpus. Each record pairs a natural-language question with a JSON schema that the model must follow and a ground-truth answer verified against the source context. We evaluate 21 frontier and open-weight models across three source domains and seven metrics. Our results reveal a consistent pattern: models achieve near-perfect schema compliance, yet the best Value Accuracy, measured by exact leaf-value match, reaches only 83.0% on text, 67.2% on images, and 23.7% on audio, where longer context makes extraction substantially harder. We release the dataset, evaluation pipeline, and all related code.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Apr 2026.

Builds on

20 of 41 references.

References · 20

  1. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  2. 2022Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervisioncited by 3,972
  3. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
  4. 2023MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?cited by 2,105
  5. 2022ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoningcited by 1,449
  6. 2020DocVQA: A Dataset for VQA on Document Imagescited by 1,288
  7. 2020Constructing A Multi-hop QA Dataset for Comprehensive Evaluation of Reasoning Stepscited by 1,259
  8. 2023FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generationcited by 1,259
  9. 2023Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 1,143
  10. 2023SGLang: Efficient Execution of Structured Language Model Programscited by 1,107
  11. 2021MuSiQue: Multihop Questions via Single-hop Question Compositioncited by 893
  12. 2021InfographicVQAcited by 430
8 more
  1. 2023Efficient Guided Generation for Large Language Modelscited by 192
  2. 2025Generalizing Verifiable Instruction Followingcited by 178
  3. 2025olmOCR: Unlocking Trillions of Tokens in PDFs with Vision Language Modelscited by 120
  4. 2023FollowBench: A Multi-level Fine-grained Constraints Following Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 112
  5. 2024Grammar-Aligned Decodingcited by 54
  6. 2025StructEval: Benchmarking LLMs' Capabilities to Generate Structural Outputscited by 23
  7. 2023A Unified View of Evaluation Metrics for Structured Predictioncited by 11
  8. 2026ExtractBench: A Benchmark and Evaluation Methodology for Complex Structured Extractioncited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.