mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Query-Efficient Quantum Approximate Optimization via Graph-Conditioned Trust Regions

arXiv 2604.24803 ↗First posted 27 Apr 2026cs.LG quant-phcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In low-depth implementations of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), the dominant cost is often the number of objective evaluations rather than circuit depth. We introduce a graph-conditioned trust-region method for reducing this query cost. A graph neural network predicts a Gaussian distribution N(mu, Sigma) over QAOA angles. The mean initializes a local optimizer, the covariance defines an ellipsoidal trust region that constrains the search, and the predicted uncertainty determines an instance-dependent evaluation budget. Thus the learned distribution defines a search policy rather than only an initial parameter estimate. Under explicit assumptions on local smoothness, curvature, calibration, and noise, we derive bounds on objective degradation within the trust region, lower bounds on gradient variance, preservation of expected objective ordering under depolarizing noise, and finite-sample coverage guarantees. We evaluate the method for MaxCut at depth p = 2 on Erdos-Renyi, 3-regular, Barabasi-Albert, and Watts-Strogatz graphs with n = 8-16 vertices. Relative to random restarts and the strongest learned point-prediction baseline, the method reduces the mean number of circuit evaluations from 343 and 85 to 45 +/- 7, while maintaining sampled approximation ratios within 3 percentage points of concentration-based heuristics. The method does not improve absolute approximation ratios; its advantage is reduced query cost at comparable solution quality. The predictive uncertainty is calibrated in the experiments, with ECE = 0.052 and Spearman correlation rho = 0.770, and the learned trust regions transfer to graph sizes not used during training. The results identify a low-depth, query-dominated regime in which graph-conditioned trust regions reduce the query cost of QAOA without modifying the ansatz.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Apr 2026.

Builds on

43 of 77 references.

References · 43

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  3. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
  4. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
  5. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
  6. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
  7. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  8. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,355
  9. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
  10. 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,460
  11. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
  12. 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,277
31 more
  1. 2020Graph Contrastive Learning with Augmentationscited by 1,203
  2. 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 903
  3. 2020A Review of Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning: Techniques, Applications and Challengescited by 813
  4. 2021A Gentle Introduction to Conformal Prediction and Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 777
  5. 2020Variational Quantum Algorithmscited by 687
  6. 2017Spectrally-normalized margin bounds for neural networkscited by 681
  7. 2020Benchmarking Graph Neural Networkscited by 672
  8. 2018Attention, Learn to Solve Routing Problems!cited by 646
  9. 2018Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapescited by 624
  10. 2019Conformalized Quantile Regressioncited by 620
  11. 2018Machine Learning for Combinatorial Optimization: a Methodological Tour d'Horizoncited by 612
  12. 2017Learning Combinatorial Optimization Algorithms over Graphscited by 557
  13. 2021Rethinking Graph Transformers with Spectral Attentioncited by 468
  14. 2018Accurate Uncertainties for Deep Learning Using Calibrated Regressioncited by 417
  15. 2017A PAC-Bayesian Approach to Spectrally-Normalized Margin Bounds for Neural Networkscited by 309
  16. 2017Size-Independent Sample Complexity of Neural Networkscited by 289
  17. 2021Combinatorial optimization and reasoning with graph neural networkscited by 267
  18. 2021Learning to Optimize: A Primer and A Benchmarkcited by 206
  19. 2021Adversarial Graph Augmentation to Improve Graph Contrastive Learningcited by 200
  20. 2015Learning with a Wasserstein Losscited by 194
  21. 2020Noise-Induced Barren Plateaus in Variational Quantum Algorithmscited by 192
  22. 2022Sign and Basis Invariant Networks for Spectral Graph Representation Learningcited by 176
  23. 2022Uncertainty Quantification in Scientific Machine Learning: Methods, Metrics, and Comparisonscited by 169
  24. 2016Discriminative Embeddings of Latent Variable Models for Structured Datacited by 130
  25. 2021Combinatorial Optimization with Physics-Inspired Graph Neural Networkscited by 107
  26. 2021Theory of overparametrization in quantum neural networkscited by 100
  27. 2022Tutorial on amortized optimizationcited by 83
  28. 2020Effect of barren plateaus on gradient-free optimizationcited by 79
  29. 2021Amortized Implicit Differentiation for Stochastic Bilevel Optimizationcited by 62
  30. 2019Learning to Optimize Variational Quantum Circuits to Solve Combinatorial Problemscited by 30
  31. 2021Graph neural network initialisation of quantum approximate optimisationcited by 13

Built on by

Not cited yet.