mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SUDA-Muon: Structural Design Principles and Boundaries for Fully Decentralized Muon

arXiv 2604.23980 ↗First posted 27 Apr 2026math.OCcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Fully decentralized Muon is difficult because its nonlinear matrix-sign operator does not commute with linear gossip averaging. This makes decentralized Muon a structural design problem: in designing the algorithm, one must distinguish modular components from non-modular ones. We propose sudamuon, which realizes this separation through a unified primal--dual communication template called SUDA; within this template, ED/D2, EXTRA, and gradient tracking become modular backbone choices. We prove a topology-separated non-asymptotic convergence guarantee in the nuclear-norm geometry: the dominant term scales as O((1+σ/√N)K-1/4) and does not explicitly involve graph quantities, identifying the communication backbone as the modular axis in the structure design. We then establish two complementary non-modular boundaries. Internally, tracking-before-polarization is necessary for this natural no-tracking variant to avoid non-stationary fixed points under heterogeneous objectives. Externally, in the absence of a central server, a fully decentralized method cannot perform the federated average-then-polarize update; we show that this non-modular local-polarize-then-average design is the essential reason why can fail to exhibit linear speedup. Experiments on CIFAR-100 and GPT-2 fine-tuning support the same picture: the unified template makes different communication algorithms directly comparable. In mild near-IID regimes, the resulting variants perform similarly, while in the more difficult long-horizon non-IID CIFAR-100 setting, sudamuon achieves higher accuracy and lower loss than textscDeMuon.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Apr 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.