OptProver: Bridging Olympiad and Optimization through Continual Training in Formal Theorem Proving
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advances in formal theorem proving have focused on Olympiad-level mathematics, leaving undergraduate domains largely unexplored. Optimization, fundamental to machine learning, operations research, and scientific computing, remains underserved by existing provers. Its reliance on domain-specific formalisms (convexity, optimality conditions, and algorithmic analysis) creates significant distribution shift, making naive domain transfer ineffective. We present OptProver, a trained model that achieves robust transfer from Olympiad to undergraduate optimization. Starting from a strong Olympiad-level prover, our pipeline mitigates distribution shift through two key innovations. First, we employ large-scale optimization-focused data curation via expert iteration. Second, we introduce a specialized preference learning objective that integrates perplexity-weighted optimization with a mechanism to penalize valid but non-progressing proof steps. This not only addresses distribution shifts but also guides the search toward efficient trajectories. To enable rigorous evaluation, we construct a novel benchmark in Lean 4 focused on optimization. On this benchmark, OptProver achieves state-of-the-art Pass@1 and Pass@32 among comparably sized models while maintaining competitive performance on general theorem-proving tasks, demonstrating effective domain transfer without catastrophic forgetting.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Apr 2026.
Builds on
24 of 34 references.
References · 24
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
- 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Modelscited by 1,359
- 2024OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problemscited by 1,099
- 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Rewardcited by 951
- 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferencescited by 906
- 2023LeanDojo: Theorem Proving with Retrieval-Augmented Language Modelscited by 414
- 2021MiniF2F: a cross-system benchmark for formal Olympiad-level mathematicscited by 380
- 2020Generative Language Modeling for Automated Theorem Provingcited by 379
12 more
- 2023Data Selection for Language Models via Importance Resamplingcited by 322
- 2024Large Language Models for Mathematical Reasoning: Progresses and Challengescited by 283
- 2025DeepSeek-Prover-V2: Advancing Formal Mathematical Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning for Subgoal Decompositioncited by 270
- 2022HyperTree Proof Search for Neural Theorem Provingcited by 192
- 2023ProofNet: Autoformalizing and Formally Proving Undergraduate-Level Mathematicscited by 180
- 2025Kimina-Prover Preview: Towards Large Formal Reasoning Models with Reinforcement Learningcited by 173
- 2025Goedel-Prover-V2: Scaling Formal Theorem Proving with Scaffolded Data Synthesis and Self-Correctioncited by 140
- 2025BFS-Prover: Scalable Best-First Tree Search for LLM-based Automatic Theorem Provingcited by 82
- 2025Scaling up Multi-Turn Off-Policy RL and Multi-Agent Tree Search for LLM Step-Proverscited by 26
- 2025DeepTheorem: Advancing LLM Reasoning for Theorem Proving Through Natural Language and Reinforcement Learningcited by 23
- 2025Mitigating Forgetting in LLM Fine-Tuning via Low-Perplexity Token Learningcited by 12
- 2024Language Model-Driven Data Pruning Enables Efficient Active Learningcited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.