mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Preserve, Then Resolve: Many-to-Many Association and Robust Estimation with General-Purpose Visual Features

arXiv 2604.23670 ↗First posted 26 Apr 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The semantic transferability of general-purpose visual features does not guarantee geometric consistency across images. Using frozen DINOv3 features, we show that geometrically correct correspondences often fall below rank one in cosine similarity yet remain within a small top-K candidate set. This motivates a preserve-then-resolve design: we retain multiple candidates in a many-to-many (m-to-m) association graph and defer their disambiguation to robust estimation. We study m-to-m robust estimation from a probabilistic perspective. We interpret the existing Matching Cardinality Maximization (MCM) mechanism as a dominant-cardinality approximation to likelihood maximization and propose a faster, real-valued mechanism called Harmonic Consensus Maximization (HCM). A two-stage LO-RANSAC uses HCM for candidate sourcing and MCM for graph-aware selection. We evaluate end-task gains in relative-pose estimation, where our pipeline consistently improves rank-one baselines for DINOv2, DINOv3, V-JEPA 2.1, and SigLIP 2. Code is available at https://github.com/LIAS-CUHKSZ/preservethenresolve.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Apr 2026.

Builds on

28 of 36 references.

References · 28

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
  3. 2017ScanNet: Richly-annotated 3D Reconstructions of Indoor Scenescited by 3,117
  4. 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,316
  5. 2019SuperGlue: Learning Feature Matching with Graph Neural Networkscited by 1,443
  6. 2025DINOv3cited by 1,414
  7. 2017SuperPoint: Self-Supervised Interest Point Detection and Descriptioncited by 1,320
  8. 2025SigLIP 2: Multilingual Vision-Language Encoders with Improved Semantic Understanding, Localization, and Dense Featurescited by 1,188
  9. 2021LoFTR: Detector-Free Local Feature Matching with Transformerscited by 984
  10. 2024Grounding Image Matching in 3D with MASt3Rcited by 983
  11. 2018MegaDepth: Learning Single-View Depth Prediction from Internet Photoscited by 737
  12. 2023LightGlue: Local Feature Matching at Light Speedcited by 590
16 more
  1. 2023Emergent Correspondence from Image Diffusioncited by 446
  2. 2021Deep ViT Features as Dense Visual Descriptorscited by 330
  3. 2023A Tale of Two Features: Stable Diffusion Complements DINO for Zero-Shot Semantic Correspondencecited by 301
  4. 2020TEASER: Fast and Certifiable Point Cloud Registrationcited by 274
  5. 2024Probing the 3D Awareness of Visual Foundation Modelscited by 177
  6. 2023AnyLoc: Towards Universal Visual Place Recognitioncited by 163
  7. 2024Efficient LoFTR: Semi-Dense Local Feature Matching with Sparse-Like Speedcited by 120
  8. 2026V-JEPA 2.1: Unlocking Dense Features in Video Self-Supervised Learningcited by 117
  9. 2023Telling Left from Right: Identifying Geometry-Aware Semantic Correspondencecited by 86
  10. 2024OmniGlue: Generalizable Feature Matching with Foundation Model Guidancecited by 56
  11. 2024XoFTR: Cross-modal Feature Matching Transformercited by 48
  12. 2018Hybrid Scene Compression for Visual Localizationcited by 40
  13. 2020Outlier-Robust Estimation: Hardness, Minimally Tuned Algorithms, and Applicationscited by 26
  14. 2026INSID3: Training-Free In-Context Segmentation with DINOv3cited by 12
  15. 2022Certifiably Optimal Mutual Localization with Anonymous Bearing Measurementscited by 1
  16. 2025SCORE: Saturated Consensus Relocalization in Semantic Line Mapscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.