mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

From Rights to Rites: Expectations Management in Smart-Home AI

arXiv 2604.23635 ↗First posted 26 Apr 2026cs.HC cs.AI cs.IRcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Domestic voice assistants and smart-home devices are increasingly embedded in everyday routines, yet their ethics are often treated as an afterthought or delegated to compliance teams. To explore how expectations about smart-home AI are constructed and managed, we conducted 33 semi-structured interviews with designers, developers, and researchers from major smart-home platforms (Amazon Alexa, Microsoft Azure IoT, and Google Nest). Using a constructivist grounded theory approach, we develop Expectations Management (EM): a culturally embedded model describing how practitioners shape, calibrate, and repair expectations by balancing organisational rights with culturally situated rites. We show that EM differs from expectation-confirmation theory and trust-calibration by foregrounding moral judgement, situated action, and cross-cultural variation. Our analysis reveals four recurring design tensions: automation vs. autonomy, helpfulness vs. intrusiveness, personalisation vs. predictability, and transparency vs. obscurity and distils them into a five-phase EM Design Playbook that supports moral prudence. We discuss implications for responsible smart-home design and offer guidance for human-centred AI.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 0 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Apr 2026.

Builds on

0 of 21 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.