mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CyberCane: Neuro-Symbolic RAG for Privacy-Preserving Phishing Detection with Formal Ontology Reasoning

arXiv 2604.23563 ↗First posted 26 Apr 2026cs.CR cs.AI cs.IRcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Privacy-critical domains require phishing detection systems that satisfy contradictory constraints: near-zero false positives to prevent workflow disruption, transparent explanations for non-expert staff, strict regulatory compliance prohibiting sensitive data exposure to external APIs, and robustness against AI-generated attacks. Existing rule-based systems are brittle to novel campaigns, while LLM-based detectors violate privacy regulations through unredacted data transmission. We introduce CyberCane, a neuro-symbolic framework integrating deterministic symbolic analysis with privacy-preserving retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). Our dual-phase pipeline applies lightweight symbolic rules to email metadata, then escalates borderline cases to semantic classification via RAG with automated sensitive data redaction and retrieval from a phishing-only corpus. We further introduce PhishOnt, an OWL ontology enabling verifiable attack classification through formal reasoning chains. Evaluation on DataPhish2025 (12.3k emails; mixed human/LLM) and Nazario/SpamAssassin demonstrates a 78.6-point recall gain over symbolic-only detection on AI-generated threats, with precision exceeding 98% and FPR as low as 0.16%. Healthcare deployment projects a 542x ROI; tunable operating points support diverse risk tolerances, with open-source implementation at https://github.com/sbhakim/Cybercane.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Apr 2026.

Builds on

11 of 31 references.

References · 11

  1. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
  2. 2016Efficient and robust approximate nearest neighbor search using Hierarchical Navigable Small World graphscited by 853
  3. 2020Neurosymbolic AI: The 3rd Wavecited by 253
  4. 2016Harnessing Deep Neural Networks with Logic Rulescited by 135
  5. 2023Sentence Embedding Leaks More Information than You Expect: Generative Embedding Inversion Attack to Recover the Whole Sentencecited by 81
  6. 2024KnowPhish: Large Language Models Meet Multimodal Knowledge Graphs for Enhancing Reference-Based Phishing Detectioncited by 29
  7. 2024ChatSpamDetector: Leveraging Large Language Models for Effective Phishing Email Detectioncited by 25
  8. 2025SoK: The Privacy Paradox of Large Language Models: Advancements, Privacy Risks, and Mitigationcited by 18
  9. 2024MoRSE: Bridging the Gap in Cybersecurity Expertise with Retrieval Augmented Generationcited by 8
  10. 2025SymRAG: Efficient Neuro-Symbolic Retrieval Through Adaptive Query Routingcited by 5
  11. 2025Neuro-Symbolic AI for Cybersecurity: State of the Art, Challenges, and Opportunitiescited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026User-Centric Phishing Detection: A RAG and LLM-Based Approach ↗
  2. 2025Evaluating Large Language Models for Phishing Detection, Self-Consistency, Faithfulness, and Explainability
  3. 2026MemoPhishAgent: Memory-Augmented Multi-Modal LLM Agent for Phishing URL Detection
  4. 2025PhishIntentionLLM: Uncovering Phishing Website Intentions through Multi-Agent Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  5. 2025PhishDebate: An LLM-Based Multi-Agent Framework for Phishing Website Detection
  6. 2025EvoMail: Self-Evolving Cognitive Agents for Adaptive Spam and Phishing Email Defense
  7. 2026Eliciting Least-to-Most Reasoning for Phishing URL Detection
  8. 2025MultiPhishGuard: An Explainable and Adaptive Multi-Agent LLM System for Phishing Email Detection