A Heterogeneous Two-Stream Framework for Video Action Recognition with Comparative Fusion Analysis
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Most two-stream action recognition networks apply the same convolutional backbone to both RGB and optical flow streams, ignoring the fact that the two modalities have fundamentally different structural properties. Optical flow captures fine-grained motion patterns, while RGB frames carry rich appearance and scene context - treating them identically discards this distinction. We propose DualStreamHybrid, a heterogeneous two-stream architecture that assigns each stream a backbone suited to its input: a pretrained ViT-Tiny/16 for RGB frames, and a MobileNetV2 trained from scratch on a 20-channel stacked optical flow representation. A learned projection layer maps the two differently-sized feature vectors to a common dimensionality before fusion, enabling the two streams to interact without forcing architectural symmetry. We design five fusion strategies within a unified framework - late fusion, concatenation, cross-attention, weighted fusion, and gated fusion - and evaluate them on UCF11 (1,600 videos, 11 classes) and UCF50 (6,681 videos, 50 classes) to study how fusion behaviour scales with dataset size. On UCF11, cross-attention achieves 98.12% test accuracy, outperforming the RGB-only ViT-Tiny baseline of 95.94%, which suggests that explicit inter-modal attention is particularly effective on smaller, less complex datasets. On UCF50, weighted fusion reaches 96.86% and proves the most consistent strategy across both benchmarks. The learned stream weights reveal an interesting pattern: UCF11 sees near-equal modality contribution (RGB: 0.507, flow: 0.493), while UCF50 favours the RGB stream slightly more (RGB: 0.554, flow: 0.446) - arguably reflecting the larger and more visually diverse action space. Taken together, these results suggest that even a lightweight motion stream meaningfully complements a strong appearance encoder, and that the optimal fusion strategy depends on dataset scale.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Apr 2026.
Builds on
20 of 35 references.
References · 20
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
- 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,795
- 2017Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Datasetcited by 3,270
- 2020RAFT: Recurrent All-Pairs Field Transforms for Optical Flowcited by 2,415
- 2017The Kinetics Human Action Video Datasetcited by 1,909
- 2018SlowFast Networks for Video Recognitioncited by 1,867
- 2021Is Space-Time Attention All You Need for Video Understanding?cited by 1,620
- 2021ViViT: A Video Vision Transformercited by 1,620
- 2018Attention-based Deep Multiple Instance Learningcited by 1,095
8 more
- 2021Video Swin Transformercited by 1,091
- 2014Two-Stream Convolutional Networks for Action Recognition in Videoscited by 1,068
- 2017PWC-Net: CNNs for Optical Flow Using Pyramid, Warping, and Cost Volumecited by 968
- 2016Temporal Segment Networks: Towards Good Practices for Deep Action Recognitioncited by 902
- 2016Convolutional Two-Stream Network Fusion for Video Action Recognitioncited by 384
- 2019Audio-Visual Scene-Aware Dialogcited by 123
- 2017Learning Compact Recurrent Neural Networks with Block-Term Tensor Decompositioncited by 33
- 2017Two Stream LSTM: A Deep Fusion Framework for Human Action Recognitioncited by 18
Built on by
Not cited yet.