Evaluating Large Language Models on Computer Science University Exams in Data Structures
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present a comprehensive evaluation of Large Language Models (LLMs) on Computer Science (CS) Data Structure examination questions. Our work introduces a new benchmark dataset comprising exam questions from Tel Aviv University (TAU), curated to assess LLMs' abilities in handling closed and multiple-choice questions. We evaluated the performance of OpenAI's GPT 4o and Anthropic's Claude 3.5, popular LLMs, alongside two smaller LLMs, Mathstral 7B and LLaMA 3 8B, across the TAU exams benchmark. Our findings provide insight into the current capabilities of LLMs in CS education.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 9 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Apr 2026.
Builds on
6 of 9 references.
References · 6
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
- 2024GSM-Symbolic: Understanding the Limitations of Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 550
- 2024Evaluating the Effectiveness of LLMs in Introductory Computer Science Education: A Semester-Long Field Studycited by 26
Built on by
Not cited yet.