Shape of Memory: a Geometric Analysis of Machine Unlearning in Second-Order Optimizers
On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning
Abstract (arXiv)
We argue that current definitions of machine unlearning are underspecified for second-order optimizers. We compare first-order and second-order learners for their ability to handle the data deletion task with varying degrees of eigendecomposition to mimic the loss model memory. While both first and second-order methods realign with the ideal counterfactul in terms of performance and gradient, the second-order optimizer shows significant volatility in the optimizer state. This indicates residual information, supposedly deleted, that isn't detectable by first-order analysis. Various eigendecay treatments show that stability and information loss is regained only under controlled state pertubation where geometric information (or memory) is erased.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 7 of its 10 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Apr 2026.
Builds on
7 of 10 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 6
- 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
- 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,020
- 2019Certified Data Removal from Machine Learning Modelscited by 512
- 2019Making AI Forget You: Data Deletion in Machine Learningcited by 447
- 2020When Machine Unlearning Jeopardizes Privacycited by 181
- 2014Global Convergence of Online Limited Memory BFGScited by 18
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.