mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Shape of Memory: a Geometric Analysis of Machine Unlearning in Second-Order Optimizers

arXiv 2604.23046 ↗First posted 24 Apr 2026cs.LG cs.IT cs.SIcited by 1

On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning

Abstract (arXiv)

We argue that current definitions of machine unlearning are underspecified for second-order optimizers. We compare first-order and second-order learners for their ability to handle the data deletion task with varying degrees of eigendecomposition to mimic the loss model memory. While both first and second-order methods realign with the ideal counterfactul in terms of performance and gradient, the second-order optimizer shows significant volatility in the optimizer state. This indicates residual information, supposedly deleted, that isn't detectable by first-order analysis. Various eigendecay treatments show that stability and information loss is regained only under controlled state pertubation where geometric information (or memory) is erased.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 7 of its 10 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Apr 2026.

Builds on

7 of 10 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2021Remember What You Want to Forget: Algorithms for Machine Unlearning4 Mar

Other references · 6

  1. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
  2. 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,020
  3. 2019Certified Data Removal from Machine Learning Modelscited by 512
  4. 2019Making AI Forget You: Data Deletion in Machine Learningcited by 447
  5. 2020When Machine Unlearning Jeopardizes Privacycited by 181
  6. 2014Global Convergence of Online Limited Memory BFGScited by 18

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.