mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Your Reviews Replicate You: LLM-Based Agents as Customer Digital Twins for Conjoint Analysis

arXiv 2604.22756 ↗First posted 6 Mar 2026cs.IR cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Social simulation and multi-agent debate

Abstract (arXiv)

Conjoint analysis is a cornerstone of market research for estimating consumer preferences; however, traditional methods face persistent challenges regarding time, cost, and respondent fatigue. To address these limitations, this study proposes a framework that utilizes large language model (LLM)-based "customer digital twins (CDT)" as virtual respondents. We identified active users within the Reddit community and aggregated their comprehensive review histories to construct individualized vector databases. By integrating retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) with prompt engineering, this study developed customer agents capable of dynamically retrieving and reasoning upon their specific past preferences and constraints. These customer agents, called CDTs, performed pairwise comparison tasks on product profiles generated via fractional factorial design, and the resulting choice data was analyzed to estimate part-worth utilities by logistic regression. Empirical validation demonstrates that these CDTs predict the preferences of actual users with 87.73% accuracy. Furthermore, a case study on the computer monitor category successfully quantified trade-offs between attributes such as panel type and resolution, deriving preference structures consistent with market realities. Ultimately, this study contributes to marketing research by presenting a scalable alternative that significantly improves both agility and cost-efficiency to traditional methods.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Social simulation and multi-agent debate, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 6 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2026.

Builds on

6 of 28 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023User Behavior Simulation with Large Language Model based Agents5 Jun

Other references · 5

  1. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
  2. 2023Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?cited by 759
  3. 2022Out of One, Many: Using Language Models to Simulate Human Samplescited by 737
  4. 2024Aligning with Human Judgement: The Role of Pairwise Preference in Large Language Model Evaluatorscited by 146
  5. 2025PersonaBOT: Bringing Customer Personas to Life with LLMs and RAGcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026From Prompts to Preferences: An Open-Source Platform for Generative AI-Enhanced Conjoint Analysis ↗
  2. 2026Synthetic Personalities: How Well Can LLMs Mimic Individual Respondents Using Socio-Economic Microdata?
  3. 2024Large Language Models for Market Research: A Data-augmentation Approach
  4. 2026Synthetic Data in Marketing Research: How to Evaluate and When to Trust
  5. 2026Multi-dimensional Bias in Modeling Multi-dimensional Preferences: Evaluating the Ability of Synthetic Agents to Replace Human Participants in Conjoint Experiments
  6. 2026Evaluating LLM-Generated Preference Distributions
  7. 2026Auditing Preferences for Brands and Cultures in LLMs
  8. 2025Implementing Rational Choice Functions with LLMs and Measuring their Alignment with User Preferences