Explanation of Dynamic Physical Field Predictions using WassersteinGrad: Application to Autoregressive Weather Forecasting
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As the demand to integrate Artificial Intelligence into high-stakes environments continues to grow, explaining the reasoning behind neural-network predictions has shifted from a theoretical curiosity to a strict operational requirement. Our work is motivated by the explanations of autoregressive neural predictions on dynamic physical fields, as in weather forecasting. Gradient-based feature attribution methods are widely used to explain the predictions on such data, in particular due to their scalability to high-dimensional inputs. It is also interesting to remark that gradient-based techniques such as SmoothGrad are now standard on images to robustify the explanations using pointwise averages of the attribution maps obtained from several noised inputs. Our goal is to efficiently adapt this aggregation strategy to dynamic physical fields. To do so, our first contribution is to identify a fundamental failure mode when averaging perturbed attribution maps on dynamic physical fields: stochastic input perturbations do not induce stationary amplitude noise in attribution maps, but instead cause a geometric displacement of the attributions. Consequently, pointwise averaging blurs these spatially misaligned features. To tackle this issue, we introduce WassersteinGrad, which extracts a geometric consensus of perturbed attribution maps by computing their entropic Wasserstein barycenter. The results, obtained on regional weather data and a meteorologist-validated neural model, demonstrate promising explainability properties of WassersteinGrad over gradient-based baselines across both single-step and autoregressive forecasting settings.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Apr 2026.
Builds on
28 of 52 references.
References · 28
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
- 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,277
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
- 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,324
- 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
- 2018On the Robustness of Interpretability Methodscited by 310
- 2013Fast Computation of Wasserstein Barycenterscited by 216
- 2020The Lipschitz Constant of Self-Attentioncited by 171
16 more
- 2023A mathematical perspective on Transformerscited by 160
- 2017The Shattered Gradients Problem: If resnets are the answer, then what is the question?cited by 156
- 2022UNETR++: Delving into Efficient and Accurate 3D Medical Image Segmentationcited by 112
- 2022A Consistent and Efficient Evaluation Strategy for Attribution Methodscited by 100
- 2025Skillful joint probabilistic weather forecasting from marginalscited by 53
- 2018Local Explanation Methods for Deep Neural Networks Lack Sensitivity to Parameter Valuescited by 40
- 2024Gradient based Feature Attribution in Explainable AI: A Technical Reviewcited by 34
- 2015Fast Discrete Distribution Clustering Using Wasserstein Barycenter with Sparse Supportcited by 30
- 2021NoiseGrad: Enhancing Explanations by Introducing Stochasticity to Model Weightscited by 28
- 2023Finding the right XAI method -- A Guide for the Evaluation and Ranking of Explainable AI Methods in Climate Sciencecited by 25
- 2025A multiscale analysis of mean-field transformers in the moderate interaction regimecited by 24
- 2025The Mean-Field Dynamics of Transformerscited by 24
- 2019Wasserstein Barycenter Model Ensemblingcited by 10
- 2024AdaptGrad: Adaptive Sampling to Reduce Noisecited by 2
- 2025Wasserstein Distances Made Explainable: Insights Into Dataset Shifts and Transport Phenomenacited by 2
- 2025On Spectral Properties of Gradient-based Explanation Methodscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.