mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Tell Me Why: Designing an Explainable LLM-based Dialogue System for Student Problem Behavior Diagnosis

arXiv 2604.22237 ↗First posted 24 Apr 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Diagnosing student problem behaviors requires teachers to synthesize multifaceted information, identify behavioral categories, and plan intervention strategies. Although fine-tuned large language models (LLMs) can support this process through multi-turn dialogue, they rarely explain why a strategy is recommended, limiting transparency and teachers' trust. To address this issue, we present an explainable dialogue system built on a fine-tuned LLM. The system uses a hierarchical attribution method based on explainable AI (xAI) to identify dialogue evidence for each recommendation and generate a natural-language explanation based on that evidence. In technical evaluation, the method outperformed baseline approaches in identifying supporting evidence. In a preliminary user study with 22 pre-service teachers, participants who received explanations reported higher trust in the system. These findings suggest a promising direction for improving LLM explainability in educational dialogue systems.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Apr 2026.

Builds on

4 of 13 references.

References · 4

  1. 2023Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Promptingcited by 1,081
  2. 2024ContextCite: Attributing Model Generation to Contextcited by 93
  3. 2025SelfCite: Self-Supervised Alignment for Context Attribution in Large Language Modelscited by 19
  4. 2026The Why Behind the Action: Unveiling Internal Drivers via Agentic Attributioncited by 8

Built on by

Not cited yet.