Tell Me Why: Designing an Explainable LLM-based Dialogue System for Student Problem Behavior Diagnosis
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Diagnosing student problem behaviors requires teachers to synthesize multifaceted information, identify behavioral categories, and plan intervention strategies. Although fine-tuned large language models (LLMs) can support this process through multi-turn dialogue, they rarely explain why a strategy is recommended, limiting transparency and teachers' trust. To address this issue, we present an explainable dialogue system built on a fine-tuned LLM. The system uses a hierarchical attribution method based on explainable AI (xAI) to identify dialogue evidence for each recommendation and generate a natural-language explanation based on that evidence. In technical evaluation, the method outperformed baseline approaches in identifying supporting evidence. In a preliminary user study with 22 pre-service teachers, participants who received explanations reported higher trust in the system. These findings suggest a promising direction for improving LLM explainability in educational dialogue systems.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Apr 2026.
Builds on
4 of 13 references.
References · 4
- 2023Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Promptingcited by 1,081
- 2024ContextCite: Attributing Model Generation to Contextcited by 93
- 2025SelfCite: Self-Supervised Alignment for Context Attribution in Large Language Modelscited by 19
- 2026The Why Behind the Action: Unveiling Internal Drivers via Agentic Attributioncited by 8
Built on by
Not cited yet.