mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Rate-Optimal Regret for the Safe Learning-based Control of the Constrained Linear Quadratic Regulator

arXiv 2604.22158 ↗First posted 24 Apr 2026math.OC cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study the problem of adaptive control of the stochastic linear quadratic regulator (LQR) with constraints that must be satisfied at every time step. Prior work on the multidimensional problem has shown tildeO(T2/3) regret and satisfaction of robust constraints, leaving open the question of whether tildeO(√T) regret can be attained in the constrained LQR setting. We contribute to this problem by showing tildeO(√T) regret and satisfaction of chance constraints. This type of constraints allow us to handle unbounded noise and also enable analytical techniques not directly applicable to robust constraints. Our proposed algorithm for this problem uses an SDP to select an optimistic policy, and then "scales back" this policy until it is verifiably-safe. Our theoretical analysis establishes regret and constraint guarantees via a key lemma that bounds the system covariance in terms of the chosen policy. This covariance-based analysis is in contrast with the cost-to-go based analysis that is typically used in adaptive LQR.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Apr 2026.

Builds on

2 of 41 references.

References · 2

  1. 2021Safe Adaptive Learning-based Control for Constrained Linear Quadratic Regulators with Regret Guaranteescited by 11
  2. 2025Foundations of Safe Online Reinforcement Learning in the Linear Quadratic Regulator: √T-Regretcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.