mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Performance Anomaly Detection in Athletics: A Benchmarking System with Visual Analytics

arXiv 2604.21953 ↗First posted 23 Apr 2026cs.LG cs.CYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Anti-doping programs rely on biological testing to detect performance-enhancing drugs, but such testing costs over 800 per sample and is limited by short detection windows for many prohibited substances. These constraints leave large portions of athletes without regular testing, motivating complementary screening approaches that analyze routine competition results to identify suspicious performance patterns. We present a system that processes 1.6 million athletics performances from over 19,000 competitions (2010-2025) using eight detection methods ranging from statistical rules to machine learning and trajectory analysis. We validate all methods against publicly confirmed anti-doping violations to measure their effectiveness in identifying sanctioned athletes. Trajectory-based methods, which compare performances to expected career progression, achieve the best balance between detecting violations and limiting false alarms, though all methods face challenges from incomplete data and rare confirmed violations. The system provides an interactive interface for expert-driven investigation, emphasizing transparency and human judgment to support, rather than replace, established anti-doping processes.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Apr 2026.

Builds on

1 of 32 references.

References · 1

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166

Built on by

Not cited yet.