PrismaDV: Automated Task-Aware Data Unit Test Generation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Data is a central resource for modern enterprises, and data validation is essential for ensuring the reliability of downstream applications. However, existing automated data unit testing frameworks are largely task-agnostic: they validate datasets without considering the semantics and requirements of the code that consumes the data. We present PrismaDV, a compound AI system that analyzes downstream task code together with dataset profiles to identify data access patterns, infer implicit data assumptions, and generate task-aware executable data unit tests. To further adapt the data unit tests over time to specific datasets and downstream tasks, we propose "Selective Informative Feedback for Task Adaptation" (SIFTA), a prompt-optimization framework that leverages the scarce outcomes from the execution of data unit tests and downstream tasks. We evaluate PrismaDV on two new benchmarks spanning 60 tasks across five datasets, where it consistently outperforms both task-agnostic and task-aware baselines in generating unit tests that reflect the end-to-end impact of data errors. Furthermore, we show that with SIFTA, we can automatically learn prompts for PrismaDV's modules that outperform prompts written by hand or generated from a generic prompt optimizer. We publicly release our benchmarks and prototype implementation.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 87 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Apr 2026.
Builds on
17 of 87 references.
References · 17
- 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,373
- 2025AlphaEvolve: A coding agent for scientific and algorithmic discoverycited by 867
- 2023Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language Modelscited by 560
- 2023Promptbreeder: Self-Referential Self-Improvement Via Prompt Evolutioncited by 551
- 2025GEPA: Reflective Prompt Evolution Can Outperform Reinforcement Learningcited by 542
- 2024CRUXEval: A Benchmark for Code Reasoning, Understanding and Executioncited by 300
- 2024DocETL: Agentic Query Rewriting and Evaluation for Complex Document Processingcited by 52
- 2025RepoAudit: An Autonomous LLM-Agent for Repository-Level Code Auditingcited by 49
- 2024Reasoning Runtime Behavior of a Program with LLM: How Far Are We?cited by 45
- 2024CodeMind: Evaluating Large Language Models for Code Reasoningcited by 32
- 2024Reasoning Capacity in Multi-Agent Systems: Limitations, Challenges and Human-Centered Solutionscited by 17
- 2025Large Language Models (LLMs) for Source Code Analysis: applications, models and datasetscited by 16
5 more
- 2024A Comparative Study of DSL Code Generation: Fine-Tuning vs. Optimized Retrieval Augmentationcited by 10
- 2025A Tool for In-depth Analysis of Code Execution Reasoning of Large Language Modelscited by 7
- 2025Please Don't Kill My Vibe: Empowering Agents with Data Flow Controlcited by 4
- 2025LLM-Powered Proactive Data Systemscited by 1
- 2025Jupiter: Enhancing LLM Data Analysis Capabilities via Notebook and Inference-Time Value-Guided Searchcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Implementation Guidelines for Data Quality Metricscited by 0
- 2026Implementation Guidelines for Data Quality Metrics7 Oct 2026