mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Neural surrogates for crystal growth dynamics with variable supersaturation: explicit vs. implicit conditioning

arXiv 2604.21753 ↗First posted 23 Apr 2026cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall cs.CEcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Simulations of crystal growth are performed by using Convolutional Recurrent Neural Network surrogate models, trained on a dataset of time sequences computed by numerical integration of Allen-Cahn dynamics including faceting via kinetic anisotropy. Two network architectures are developed to take into account the effects of a variable supersaturation value. The first infers it implicitly by processing an input mini-sequence of a few evolution frames and then returns a consistent continuation of the evolution. The second takes the supersaturation parameter as an explicit input along with a single initial frame and predicts the entire sequence. The two models are systematically tested to establish strengths and weaknesses, comparing the prediction performance for models trained on datasets of different size and, in the first architecture, different lengths of input mini-sequence. The analysis of point-wise and mean absolute errors shows how the explicit parameter conditioning guarantees the best results, reproducing with high-fidelity the ground-truth profiles. Comparable results are achievable by the mini-sequence approach only when using larger training datasets. The trained models show strong conditioning by the supersaturation parameter, consistently reproducing its overall impact on growth rates as well as its local effect on the faceted morphology. Moreover, they are perfectly scalable even on 256 times larger domains and can be successfully extended to more than 10 times longer sequences with limited error accumulation. The analysis highlights the potential and limits of these approaches in view of their general exploitation for crystal growth simulations.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Apr 2026.

Builds on

11 of 34 references.

References · 11

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2015Convolutional LSTM Network: A Machine Learning Approach for Precipitation Nowcastingcited by 1,428
  3. 2015Delving Deeper into Convolutional Networks for Learning Video Representationscited by 146
  4. 2022Learning two-phase microstructure evolution using neural operators and autoencoder architecturescited by 72
  5. 2022Physics Guided Deep Learning for Generative Design of Crystal Materials with Symmetry Constraintscited by 30
  6. 2022Data-driven discovery of novel 2D materials by deep generative modelscited by 18
  7. 2022Deep Reinforcement Learning for Inverse Inorganic Materials Designcited by 18
  8. 2025Teaching Artificial Intelligence to Perform Rapid, Resolution-Invariant Grain Growth Modeling via Fourier Neural Operatorcited by 5
  9. 2026Artificial Intelligence in Materials Science and Engineering: Current Landscape, Key Challenges, and Future Trajectoriecited by 5
  10. 2024Extreme time extrapolation capabilities and thermodynamic consistency of physics-inspired Neural Networks for the 3D microstructure evolution of materials via Cahn-Hilliard flowcited by 4
  11. 2025High-fidelity Grain Growth Modeling: Leveraging Deep Learning for Fast Computationscited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.