mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Agentic AI-assisted coding offers a unique opportunity to instill epistemic grounding during software development

arXiv 2604.21744 ↗First posted 23 Apr 2026cs.SE cs.AI q-bio.BMcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Web, search, and research agents

Abstract (arXiv)

The capabilities of AI-assisted coding are progressing at breakneck speed. Chat-based vibe coding has evolved into fully fledged AI-assisted, agentic software development using agent scaffolds where the human developer creates a plan that agentic AIs implement. One current trend is utilizing documents beyond this plan document, such as project and method-scoped documents. Here we propose GROUNDING.md, a community-governed, field-scoped epistemic grounding document, using mass spectrometry-based proteomics as an example. We have drafted a file specific to proteomics: proteomicsGROUNDING.md (available at https://github.com/OmicsGrounding/proteomics-grounding) to demonstrate what a GROUNDING.md would look like. This explicit field-scoped grounding document encodes Hard Constraints (non-negotiable validity invariants empirically required for scientific correctness) and Convention Parameters (community-agreed defaults) that override all other contexts to enforce validity, regardless of what the user prompts. In practice, this will empower a non-domain expert to generate code, tools, and software that have best practices baked in at the ground level, providing confidence to the software developer but also to those reviewing or using the final product. Undoubtedly it is easier to have agentic AIs adhere to guidelines than humans, and this opportunity allows for organizations to develop epistemic grounding documents in such a way as to keep domain experts in the loop in a future of democratized generation of bespoke software solutions.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 3 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Apr 2026.

Builds on

3 of 30 references.

References · 3

  1. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
  2. 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,642
  3. 2026Evaluating AGENTS.md: Are Repository-Level Context Files Helpful for Coding Agents?cited by 20

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026On Accelerating Grounded Code Development for Research
  2. 2026Spec Kit Agents: Context-Grounded Agentic Workflows
  3. 2025From Reproduction to Replication: Evaluating Research Agents with Progressive Code Masking
  4. 2025Vibe Coding vs. Agentic Coding: Fundamentals and Practical Implications of Agentic AI
  5. 2026NatureBench: Can Coding Agents Match the Published SOTA of Nature-Family Papers?
  6. 2026Grounded Skill Synthesis from Code at Scale for Agentic Intelligence
  7. 2026A case study of evaluating AI agents on a neuroscience data-to-discovery pipeline
  8. 2026Scientific Agent Skills: A Library of Procedural Knowledge for Research Agents