mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SGD at the Edge of Stability: The Stochastic Sharpness Gap

arXiv 2604.21016 ↗First posted 22 Apr 2026cs.LG cs.AI math.OCcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

When training neural networks with full-batch gradient descent (GD) and step size η, the largest eigenvalue of the Hessian -- the sharpness S(boldsymbolθ) -- rises to 2/η and hovers there, a phenomenon termed the Edge of Stability (EoS). citetdamian2023selfstab showed that this behavior is explained by a self-stabilization mechanism driven by third-order structure of the loss, and that GD implicitly follows projected gradient descent (PGD) on the constraint S(boldsymbolθ)≤ 2/η. For mini-batch stochastic gradient descent (SGD), the sharpness stabilizes below 2/η, with the gap widening as the batch size decreases; yet no theoretical explanation exists for this suppression. We introduce stochastic self-stabilization, extending the self-stabilization framework to SGD. Our key insight is that gradient noise injects variance into the oscillatory dynamics along the top Hessian eigenvector, strengthening the cubic sharpness-reducing force and shifting the equilibrium below 2/η. Following the approach of citetdamian2023selfstab, we define stochastic predicted dynamics relative to a moving projected gradient descent trajectory and prove a stochastic coupling theorem that bounds the deviation of SGD from these predictions. We derive a closed-form equilibrium sharpness gap: Delta S = η β σ_boldsymbolu2/(4α), where α is the progressive sharpening rate, β is the self-stabilization strength, and σ_ boldsymbolu2 is the gradient noise variance projected onto the top eigenvector. This formula predicts that smaller batch sizes yield flatter solutions and recovers GD when the batch equals the full dataset.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Apr 2026.

Builds on

21 of 24 references.

References · 21

  1. 2016On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minimacited by 1,352
  2. 2021Gradient Descent on Neural Networks Typically Occurs at the Edge of Stabilitycited by 427
  3. 2017Three Factors Influencing Minima in SGDcited by 273
  4. 2020The large learning rate phase of deep learning: the catapult mechanismcited by 216
  5. 2021On the Origin of Implicit Regularization in Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 184
  6. 2022Neural Networks can Learn Representations with Gradient Descentcited by 161
  7. 2022Self-Stabilization: The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent at the Edge of Stabilitycited by 155
  8. 2020The Break-Even Point on Optimization Trajectories of Deep Neural Networkscited by 150
  9. 2022Understanding Gradient Descent on Edge of Stability in Deep Learningcited by 128
  10. 2021Label Noise SGD Provably Prefers Flat Global Minimizerscited by 121
  11. 2018On the Relation Between the Sharpest Directions of DNN Loss and the SGD Step Lengthcited by 88
  12. 2020Shape Matters: Understanding the Implicit Bias of the Noise Covariancecited by 88
9 more
  1. 2018A Walk with SGDcited by 78
  2. 2022The alignment property of SGD noise and how it helps select flat minima: A stability analysiscited by 64
  3. 2022Analyzing Sharpness along GD Trajectory: Progressive Sharpening and Edge of Stabilitycited by 63
  4. 2022Understanding Edge-of-Stability Training Dynamics with a Minimalist Examplecited by 56
  5. 2022Second-order regression models exhibit progressive sharpening to the edge of stabilitycited by 40
  6. 2022Beyond the Edge of Stability via Two-step Gradient Updatescited by 38
  7. 2023Good regularity creates large learning rate implicit biases: edge of stability, balancing, and catapultcited by 25
  8. 2023Universal Sharpness Dynamics in Neural Network Training: Fixed Point Analysis, Edge of Stability, and Route to Chaoscited by 22
  9. 2023Gradient Descent Monotonically Decreases the Sharpness of Gradient Flow Solutions in Scalar Networks and Beyondcited by 21

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.