Text-to-Distribution Prediction with Quantile Tokens and Neighbor Context
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Many applications of LLM-based text regression require predicting a full conditional distribution rather than a single point value. We study distributional regression under empirical-quantile supervision, where each input is paired with multiple observed quantile outcomes, and the target distribution is represented by a dense grid of quantiles. We address two key limitations of current approaches: the lack of local grounding for distribution estimates, and the reliance on shared representations that create an indirect bottleneck between inputs and quantile outputs. In this paper, we introduce Quantile Token Regression, which, to our knowledge, is the first work to insert dedicated quantile tokens into the input sequence, enabling direct input-output pathways for each quantile through self-attention. We further augment these quantile tokens with retrieval, incorporating semantically similar neighbor instances and their empirical distributions to ground predictions with local evidence from similar instances. We also provide the first theoretical analysis of loss functions for quantile regression, clarifying which distributional objectives each optimizes. Experiments on the Inside Airbnb and StackSample benchmark datasets with LLMs ranging from 1.7B to 14B parameters show that quantile tokens with neighbors consistently outperform baselines (~4 points lower MAPE and 2x narrower prediction intervals), with especially large gains on smaller and more challenging datasets where quantile tokens produce substantially sharper and more accurate distributions.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Apr 2026.
Builds on
12 of 33 references.
References · 12
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2023Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflectioncited by 1,800
- 2022What Can Transformers Learn In-Context? A Case Study of Simple Function Classescited by 700
- 2023Large Language Models Are Zero-Shot Time Series Forecasterscited by 491
- 2024Quantile Regression for Distributional Reward Models in RLHFcited by 59
- 2024From Words to Numbers: Your Large Language Model Is Secretly A Capable Regressor When Given In-Context Examplescited by 55
- 2021BERT Embeddings for Automatic Readability Assessmentcited by 19
- 2025TRACT: Regression-Aware Fine-tuning Meets Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 16
- 2024Fourier Head: Helping Large Language Models Learn Complex Probability Distributionscited by 10
- 2024Boosted generalized normal distributions: Integrating machine learning with operations knowledgecited by 2
- 2025LLP: LLM-Based Product Pricing in E-commercecited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.