From Fuzzy to Formal: Scaling Hospital Quality Improvement with AI
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Hospital Quality Improvement (QI) plays a critical role in optimizing healthcare delivery by translating high-level hospital goals into actionable solutions. A critical step of QI is to identify the key modifiable contributing factors, a process we call QI factor discovery, typically through expert-driven semi-structured qualitative tools like fishbone diagrams, chart reviews, and Lean Healthcare methods. AI has the potential to transform and accelerate QI factor discovery, which is traditionally time- and resource-intensive and limited in reproducibility and auditability. Nevertheless, current AI alignment methods assume the task is well-defined, whereas QI factor discovery is an exploratory, fuzzy, and iterative sense-making process that relies on complex implicit expert judgments. To design an AI pipeline that formalizes the QI process while preserving its exploratory components, we propose viewing the task as learning not only LLM prompts but also the overarching natural-language specifications. In particular, we map QI factor discovery to steps of the classical AI/ML development process (problem formalization, model learning, and model validation) where the specifications are tunable hyperparameters. Domain experts and AI agents iteratively refine both the overarching specifications and AI pipeline until AI extractions are concordant with expert annotations and aligned with clinical objectives. We applied this "Human-AI Spec-Solution Co-optimization" framework at an urban safety-net hospital to identify factors driving prolonged length of stay and unplanned 30-day readmissions. The resulting AI-for-QI pipelines achieved ≥ 70% concordance with expert annotations. Compared to prior manual Lean analyses, the AI pipeline was substantially more efficient, recovered previous findings, surfaced new modifiable factors, and produced auditable reasoning traces.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Apr 2026.
Builds on
10 of 46 references.
References · 10
- 2023Large Language Models as Optimizerscited by 830
- 2023DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelinescited by 803
- 2023Causal Reasoning and Large Language Models: Opening a New Frontier for Causalitycited by 348
- 2023Prediction-Powered Inferencecited by 214
- 2022Large Language Models are Few-Shot Clinical Information Extractorscited by 206
- 2023Bridging the Gulf of Envisioning: Cognitive Design Challenges in LLM Interfacescited by 71
- 2023Large Language Models to Identify Social Determinants of Health in Electronic Health Recordscited by 55
- 2026Human-AI Co-design for Clinical Prediction Modelscited by 9
- 2025LLMs Judging LLMs: A Simplex Perspectivecited by 3
- 2025When the Domain Expert Has No Time and the LLM Developer Has No Clinical Expertise: Real-World Lessons from LLM Co-Design in a Safety-Net Hospitalcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024AI Hospital: Benchmarking Large Language Models in a Multi-agent Medical Interaction Simulator
- 2026MedQ-Engine: A Closed-Loop Data Engine for Evolving MLLMs in Medical Image Quality Assessment
- 2024The Potential and Perils of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety
- 2026Measuring What Matters: Benchmarking Generative, Multimodal, and Agentic AI in Healthcare
- 2025CP-Env: Evaluating Large Language Models on Clinical Pathways in a Controllable Hospital Environment
- 2025Med-PRM: Medical Reasoning Models with Stepwise, Guideline-verified Process Rewards
- 2025Beyond the Leaderboard: Rethinking Medical Benchmarks for Large Language Models
- 2025Enabling Doctor-Centric Medical AI with LLMs through Workflow-Aligned Tasks and Benchmarks