mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Behavioral Transfer in AI Agents: Evidence and Privacy Implications

arXiv 2604.19925 ↗First posted 21 Apr 2026econ.GN cs.AI cs.CYcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Social simulation and multi-agent debate

Abstract (arXiv)

AI agents powered by large language models are increasingly acting on behalf of humans in social and economic environments. Prior research has focused on their task performance and effects on human outcomes, but less is known about the relationship between agents and the specific individuals who deploy them. We ask whether agents systematically reflect the behavioral characteristics of their human owners, functioning as behavioral extensions rather than producing generic outputs. We study this question using 10,659 matched human-agent pairs from Moltbook, a social media platform where each autonomous agent is publicly linked to its owner's Twitter/X account. By comparing agents' posts on Moltbook with their owners' Twitter/X activity across features spanning topics, values, affect, and linguistic style, we find systematic transfer between agents and their specific owners. This transfer persists among agents without explicit configuration, and pairs that align on one behavioral dimension tend to align on others. These patterns are consistent with transfer emerging through accumulated interaction between owners (or owners' computer environments) and their agents in everyday use. We further show that agents with stronger behavioral transfer are more likely to disclose owner-related personal information in public discourse, suggesting that the same owner-specific context that drives behavioral transfer may also create privacy risk during ordinary use. Taken together, our results indicate that AI agents do not simply generate content, but reflect owner-related context in ways that can propagate human behavioral heterogeneity into digital environments, with implications for privacy, platform design, and the governance of agentic systems.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Social simulation and multi-agent debate, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 5 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Apr 2026.

Builds on

5 of 55 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024LLM Agents Grounded in Self-Reports Enable General-Purpose Simulation of Individuals15 Nov

Other references · 4

  1. 2024The Ethics of Advanced AI Assistantscited by 103
  2. 2025Position: Privacy Is Not Just Memorization!cited by 15
  3. 2024Privacy Leakage Overshadowed by Views of AI: A Study on Human Oversight of Privacy in Language Model Agentcited by 14
  4. 2026The Moltbook Illusion: Separating Human Influence from Emergent Behavior in AI Agent Societiescited by 9

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Behavioral Determinants of Deployed AI Agents in Social Networks: A Multi-Factor Study of Personality, Model, and Guardrail Specification
  2. 2026The Rise of AI Agent Communities: Large-Scale Analysis of Discourse and Interaction on Moltbook
  3. 2026Social Simulacra in the Wild: AI Agent Communities on Moltbook
  4. 2026How Agents Represent Humans: Human-Directed Stereotypes in an Open Agent Social Network
  5. 2026ExpressionCueLens: A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Human-AI Companion Conversations on Social Media ↗
  6. 2026When Agents Talk: Discourse, Manipulation, and Risk in an Agentic Social Network
  7. 2026Gender Dynamics and Homophily in a Social Network of LLM Agents
  8. 2026Benchmarking large language model agent societies against human behavioural distributions