mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Evaluating Histogram Matching for Robust Deep learning-Based Grapevine Disease Detection

arXiv 2604.19510 ↗First posted 21 Apr 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Variability in illumination is a primary factor limiting deep learning robustness for field-based plant disease detection. This study evaluates Histogram Matching (HM), a technique that transforms the pixel intensity distribution of an image to match a reference profile, to mitigate this in grapevine classification, distinguishing among healthy leaves, downy mildew, and spider mite damage. We propose a dual-stage integration of HM: (i) as a preprocessing step for normalization, and (ii) as a data augmentation technique to introduce controlled training variability. Experiments using 1,469 RGB images (comprising homogeneous leaf-focused and heterogeneous canopy samples) to train ResNet-18 models demonstrate that this combination significantly enhances robustness on real-world canopy images. While leaf-focused samples showed marginal gains, the canopy subset improved markedly, indicating that balancing normalization with histogram-based diversification effectively bridges the domain gap caused by uncontrolled lighting.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Apr 2026.

Builds on

6 of 31 references.

References · 6

  1. 2017Random Erasing Data Augmentationcited by 1,239
  2. 2016Using Deep Learning for Image-Based Plant Disease Detectioncited by 219
  3. 2018GAN Augmentation: Augmenting Training Data using Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 107
  4. 2018Data Augmentation by Pairing Samples for Images Classificationcited by 96
  5. 2024Restoring Images in Adverse Weather Conditions via Histogram Transformercited by 73
  6. 2025Rethinking Image Histogram Matching for Image Classificationcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.