mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A neural operator framework for data-driven discovery of stability and receptivity in physical systems

arXiv 2604.19465 ↗First posted 21 Apr 2026physics.flu-dyn cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Understanding how complex systems respond to perturbations, such as whether they will remain stable or what their most sensitive patterns are, is a fundamental challenge across science and engineering. Traditional stability and receptivity (resolvent) analyses are powerful but rely on known equations and linearization, limiting their use in nonlinear or poorly modeled systems. Here, we introduce a data-driven framework that automatically identifies stability properties and optimal forcing responses from observation data alone, without requiring governing equations. By training a neural network as a dynamics emulator and using automatic differentiation to extract its Jacobian, we can compute eigenmodes and resolvent modes directly from data. We demonstrate the method on both canonical chaotic models and high-dimensional fluid flows, successfully identifying dominant instability modes and input-output structures even in strongly nonlinear regimes. By leveraging a neural network-based emulator, we readily obtain a nonlinear representation of system dynamics while additionally retrieving intricate dynamical patterns that were previously difficult to resolve. This equation-free methodology establishes a broadly applicable tool for analyzing complex, high-dimensional datasets, with immediate relevance to grand challenges in fields such as climate science, neuroscience, and fluid engineering.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 92 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Apr 2026.

Builds on

20 of 92 references.

References · 20

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  2. 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,502
  3. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
  4. 2018Deep Reinforcement Learning in a Handful of Trials using Probabilistic Dynamics Modelscited by 774
  5. 2021Machine learning accelerated computational fluid dynamicscited by 471
  6. 2021Factorized Fourier Neural Operatorscited by 249
  7. 2020Solver-in-the-Loop: Learning from Differentiable Physics to Interact with Iterative PDE-Solverscited by 205
  8. 2018Deep Learning Methods for Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Simulations of Airfoil Flowscited by 150
  9. 2014Dynamic mode decomposition with controlcited by 129
  10. 2018Latent-space Physics: Towards Learning the Temporal Evolution of Fluid Flowcited by 97
  11. 2018Deep Dynamical Modeling and Control of Unsteady Fluid Flowscited by 68
  12. 2024APEBench: A Benchmark for Autoregressive Neural Emulators of PDEscited by 60
8 more
  1. 2023Towards Stability of Autoregressive Neural Operatorscited by 59
  2. 2014Extracting spatial-temporal coherent patterns in large-scale neural recordings using dynamic mode decompositioncited by 49
  3. 2021Data-driven discovery of intrinsic dynamicscited by 45
  4. 2022Learned Turbulence Modelling with Differentiable Fluid Solvers: Physics-based Loss-functions and Optimisation Horizonscited by 39
  5. 2013Sparsity-promoting dynamic mode decompositioncited by 30
  6. 2021Kernel Learning for Robust Dynamic Mode Decomposition: Linear and Nonlinear Disambiguation Optimization (LANDO)cited by 22
  7. 2014Dynamic Mode Decomposition for Real-Time Background/Foreground Separation in Videocited by 9
  8. 2020From bypass transition to flow control and data-driven turbulence modeling: An input-output viewpointcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.