mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Towards Energy Impact on AI-Powered 6G IoT Networks: Centralized vs. Decentralized

arXiv 2604.19377 ↗First posted 21 Apr 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The emergence of sixth-generation (6G) technologies has introduced new challenges and opportunities for machine learning (ML) applications in Internet of Things (IoT) networks, particularly concerning energy efficiency. As model training and data transmission contribute significantly to energy consumption, optimizing these processes has become critical for sustainable system design. This study first conduct analysis on the energy consumption model for both centralized and decentralized architecture and then presents a testbed deployed within the German railway infrastructure, leveraging sensor data for ML-based predictive maintenance. A comparative analysis of distributed versus Centralized Learning (CL) architectures reveals that distributed models maintain competitive predictive accuracy (~90%) while reducing overall electricity consumption by up to 70%. These findings underscore the potential of distributed ML to improve energy efficiency in real-world IoT deployments, particularly by mitigating transmission-related energy costs.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Apr 2026.

Builds on

4 of 25 references.

References · 4

  1. 2020Communication-efficient Decentralized Machine Learning over Heterogeneous Networkscited by 9
  2. 2022Joint Data Deepening-and-Prefetching for Energy-Efficient Edge Learningcited by 2
  3. 2024Energy-Efficient Edge Learning via Joint Data Deepening-and-Prefetchingcited by 2
  4. 2021Energy-Efficient Distributed Machine Learning in Cloud Fog Networkscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.