Enhancing Tabular Anomaly Detection via Pseudo-Label-Guided Generation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Identifying anomalous instances in tabular data is essential for improving data reliability and maintaining system stability. Due to the scarcity of ground-truth anomaly labels, existing methods mainly rely on unsupervised anomaly detection models, or exploit a small number of labeled anomalies to facilitate detection via sample generation or contrastive learning. However, unsupervised methods lack sufficient anomaly awareness, while current generation and contrastive approaches tend to compute anomalies globally, overlooking the localized anomaly patterns of tabular features, resulting in suboptimal detection performance. To address these limitations, we propose PLAG, a pseudo-label-guided anomaly generation method designed to enhance tabular anomaly detection. Specifically, by utilizing pseudo-anomalies as guidance signals and decoupling the overall anomaly quantification of a sample into an accumulation of feature-level abnormalities, PLAG not only effectively obviates the need for scarce ground-truth labels but also provides a novel perspective for the model to comprehend localized anomalous signals at a fine-grained level. Furthermore, a two-stage data selection strategy is proposed, integrating format verification and uncertainty estimation to rigorously filter candidate samples, thereby ensuring the fidelity and diversity of the synthetic anomalies. Ultimately, these filtered synthetic anomalies serve as robust discriminative guidance, empowering the model to better separate normal and anomalous instances. Extensive experiments demonstrate that PLAG achieves state-of-the-art performance against eight representative baselines. Moreover, as a flexible framework, it integrates seamlessly with existing unsupervised detectors, consistently boosting F1-scores by 0.08 to 0.21.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Apr 2026.
Builds on
21 of 36 references.
References · 21
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,884
- 2017Improved Regularization of Convolutional Neural Networks with Cutoutcited by 1,628
- 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 913
- 2019Modeling Tabular data using Conditional GANcited by 699
- 2021Deep Neural Networks and Tabular Data: A Surveycited by 491
- 2022TabDDPM: Modelling Tabular Data with Diffusion Modelscited by 377
- 2022Language Models are Realistic Tabular Data Generatorscited by 294
- 2022ADBench: Anomaly Detection Benchmarkcited by 232
- 2023Mixed-Type Tabular Data Synthesis with Score-based Diffusion in Latent Spacecited by 186
- 2022ECOD: Unsupervised Outlier Detection Using Empirical Cumulative Distribution Functionscited by 153
- 2020COPOD: Copula-Based Outlier Detectioncited by 146
9 more
- 2020Deep Learning for Medical Anomaly Detection -- A Surveycited by 127
- 2021Neural Transformation Learning for Deep Anomaly Detection Beyond Imagescited by 99
- 2025A Comprehensive Survey of Synthetic Tabular Data Generationcited by 28
- 2022Perturbation Learning Based Anomaly Detectioncited by 24
- 2023NNG-Mix: Improving Semi-supervised Anomaly Detection with Pseudo-anomaly Generationcited by 14
- 2023Deep Anomaly Detection under Labeling Budget Constraintscited by 9
- 2023Unsupervised Anomaly Detection with Rejectioncited by 9
- 2017SafePredict: A Meta-Algorithm for Machine Learning That Uses Refusals to Guarantee Correctnesscited by 5
- 2024Unsupervised Anomaly Detection for Tabular Data Using Noise Evaluationcited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.