mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Predicting LLM Compression Degradation from Spectral Statistics

arXiv 2604.18085 ↗First posted 20 Apr 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Matrix-level low-rank compression is a promising way to reduce the cost of large language models, but running compression and evaluating the resulting models on language tasks can be prohibitively expensive. Can compression-induced degradation be predicted before committing to this compute? We systematically analyze the Qwen3 and Gemma3 model families across four representative low-rank compression methods: vanilla SVD, two ASVD variants, and SVD-LLM. We find that stable rank and information density, measured in bits per parameter, dominate performance degradation. The interaction term γ · barρs, defined as compression ratio times stable rank, is a robust predictor of accuracy degradation, achieving leave-one-out cross-validation Pearson correlations of 0.890 for attention layers and 0.839 for MLP layers. We provide theoretical intuition for why this predictor succeeds by connecting it to standard SVD truncation bounds and error composition mechanisms in transformer layers. These findings enable a predict-then-compress workflow: compute γ · barρs from weights, estimate degradation, and invest compute only in desirable configurations.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Apr 2026.

Builds on

23 of 44 references.

References · 23

  1. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  2. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
  3. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
  4. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
  5. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
  6. 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,883
  7. 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
  8. 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,183
  9. 2022GPTQ: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Generative Pre-trained Transformerscited by 1,919
  10. 2020Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Are Key-Value Memoriescited by 1,336
  11. 2023SparseGPT: Massive Language Models Can Be Accurately Pruned in One-Shotcited by 1,121
  12. 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 971
11 more
  1. 2023A Simple and Effective Pruning Approach for Large Language Modelscited by 800
  2. 2024SliceGPT: Compress Large Language Models by Deleting Rows and Columnscited by 385
  3. 2025Layer by Layer: Uncovering Hidden Representations in Language Modelscited by 311
  4. 2023ASVD: Activation-aware Singular Value Decomposition for Compressing Large Language Modelscited by 169
  5. 2024Scaling Laws for Precisioncited by 95
  6. 2025SVD-LLM V2: Optimizing Singular Value Truncation for Large Language Model Compressioncited by 67
  7. 2025How much do language models memorize?cited by 61
  8. 2026From Entropy to Epiplexity: Rethinking Information for Computationally Bounded Intelligencecited by 41
  9. 2024Densing Law of LLMscited by 40
  10. 2025To Compress or Not? Pushing the Frontier of Lossless GenAI Model Weights Compression with Exponent Concentrationcited by 5
  11. 2025Lossless Compression of Neural Network Components: Weights, Checkpoints, and K/V Caches in Low-Precision Formatscited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.