mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Conditional Attribution for Root Cause Analysis in Time-Series Anomaly Detection

arXiv 2604.17616 ↗First posted 19 Apr 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Root cause analysis (RCA) for time-series anomaly detection is critical for the reliable operation of complex real-world systems. Existing explanation methods often rely on unrealistic feature perturbations and ignore temporal and cross-feature dependencies, leading to unreliable attributions. We propose a conditional attribution framework that explains anomalies relative to contextually similar normal system states. Instead of using marginal or randomly sampled baselines, our method retrieves representative normal instances conditioned on the anomalous observation, enabling dependency-preserving and operationally meaningful explanations. To support high-dimensional time-series data, contextual retrieval is performed in learned low-dimensional representations using both variational autoencoder latent spaces and UMAP manifold embeddings. By grounding the retrieval process in the system's learned manifold, this strategy avoids out-of-distribution artifacts and ensures attribution fidelity while maintaining computational efficiency. We further introduce confidence-aware and temporal evaluation metrics for assessing explanation reliability and responsiveness. Experiments on the SWaT and MSDS benchmarks demonstrate that the proposed approach consistently improves root-cause identification accuracy, temporal localization, and robustness across multiple anomaly detection models. These results highlight the practical utility of conditional attribution for explainable anomaly diagnosis in complex time-series systems. Code and models are available at: https://github.com/dfki-av/Conditional-Attribution-for-Root-Cause-Analysis-in-Time-Series-Anomaly-Detection.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Apr 2026.

Builds on

9 of 27 references.

References · 9

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  3. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  4. 2018An Empirical Evaluation of Generic Convolutional and Recurrent Networks for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,447
  5. 2021Anomaly Transformer: Time Series Anomaly Detection with Association Discrepancycited by 387
  6. 2020Exathlon: A Benchmark for Explainable Anomaly Detection over Time Seriescited by 56
  7. 2022Causal Inference-Based Root Cause Analysis for Online Service Systems with Intervention Recognitioncited by 55
  8. 2021groupShapley: Efficient prediction explanation with Shapley values for feature groupscited by 21
  9. 2020Explaining Predictions by Approximating the Local Decision Boundarycited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.