Layer-wise MoE Routing Locality under Shared-Prefix Code Generation: Token-Identity Decomposition and Compile-Equivalent Fork Redundancy
On the map: Mixture-of-experts → Expert routing strategies
Abstract (arXiv)
In LLM-based code generation, multiple code candidates are often generated in parallel from the same prompt -- for example, in best-of-N sampling or multi-candidate code completion. These requests can share KV caches through a common prefix, yet the extent to which their Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) expert routing overlaps, and how this overlap varies across layers, remains insufficiently understood. We study Qwen3.5-35B-A3B-FP8 (256 routed experts, top-8) by performing tree-search-based branching generation from a shared prefix (851 completed codes, temperature 0.7) and analyzing the results with a compiler-output-based alignment (gcc -S -O0 assembly) that controls for token-identity confounds. Our findings are threefold: (1) At positions where both sequences generated the same token, Jaccard similarity reaches 0.649 (40x random), while even at positions with different tokens it remains 0.175 (11x random). (2) A layer-wise decomposition reveals a crossing pattern: same-token routing similarity exceeds different-token similarity across all layers, but dips in the middle layers (L14-20), while different-token similarity peaks in the middle layers at 14x random. (3) In tree-search code generation, 67% of successfully compiled codes concentrate in the top three assembly-equivalent groups, and 99.6% of within-group differences consist of comments and blank lines. We show that diversity in top-P search, including beam search, poses a significant challenge. These results refine the "context-independent routing" claim of prior work through layer-wise decomposition and suggest opportunities for improving search efficiency in LLM code generation.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Placed in Expert routing strategies, one of 12 directions in Mixture-of-experts. Builds on 8 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Apr 2026.
Builds on
8 of 12 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2026Unveiling Language Routing Isolation in Multilingual MoE Models for Interpretable Subnetwork Adaptation4 Apr
- 2026Expert Selections In MoE Models Reveal (Almost) As Much As Text4 Feb
Other references · 6
- 2023SGLang: Efficient Execution of Structured Language Model Programscited by 1,117
- 2023PowerInfer: Fast Large Language Model Serving with a Consumer-grade GPUcited by 213
- 2024OpenMoE: An Early Effort on Open Mixture-of-Experts Language Modelscited by 186
- 2024Hydragen: High-Throughput LLM Inference with Shared Prefixescited by 72
- 2025Taming Latency-Memory Trade-Off in MoE-Based LLM Serving via Fine-Grained Expert Offloadingcited by 24
- 2026XShare: Collaborative in-Batch Expert Sharing for Faster MoE Inferencecited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Certain Head, Uncertain Tail: Expert-Sample for Test-Time Scaling in Fine-Grained MoE
- 2026MoE Routing Testbed: Studying Expert Specialization and Routing Behavior at Small Scale
- 2026ELDR: Expert-Locality-Aware Decode Routing for PD-Disaggregated MoE Serving
- 2025Not All Models Suit Expert Offloading: On Local Routing Consistency of Mixture-of-Expert Models
- 2025Opportunistic Expert Activation: Batch-Aware Expert Routing for Faster Decode Without Retraining
- 2026Diagnosing Overhead in Dispatch Operations: Cross-architecture Observatory
- 2025Advancing MoE Efficiency: A Collaboration-Constrained Routing (C2R) Strategy for Better Expert Parallelism Design
- 2026CIPHER-MoE: Balancing Efficiency and Routing Fidelity in Trillion-Scale MoE Training