mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

HiveMind: OS-Inspired Scheduling for Concurrent LLM Agent Workloads

arXiv 2604.17111 ↗First posted 18 Apr 2026cs.DC cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

When multiple LLM coding agents share a rate-limited API endpoint, they exhibit resource contention patterns analogous to unscheduled OS processes competing for CPU, memory, and I/O. In a motivating incident, 3 of 11 parallel agents died from connection resets and HTTP 502 errors - a 27% failure rate - despite the API having sufficient aggregate capacity to serve all 11 sequentially. We present HIVEMIND, a transparent HTTP proxy that applies five OS-inspired scheduling primitives - admission control, rate-limit tracking, AIMD backpressure with circuit breaking, token budget management, and priority queuing - to eliminate the failure modes caused by uncoordinated parallel execution. The proxy requires zero modifications to existing agent code and supports Anthropic, OpenAI, and local model APIs via auto-detected provider profiles. Our evaluation across seven scenarios (5-50 concurrent agents) shows that uncoordinated agents fail at 72-100% rates under contention, while HIVEMIND reduces failures to 0-18% and eliminates 48-100% of wasted compute. An ablation study reveals that transparent retry - not admission control - is the single most critical primitive, but the primitives are most effective in combination. Real-world validation against Ollama confirms that HIVEMIND adds under 3ms of proxy overhead per request. The system is open-source under the MIT license.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 3 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Apr 2026.

Builds on

3 of 24 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineering6 May
  2. 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversation16 Aug

Other references · 1

  1. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,373

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Pythia: Exploiting Workflow Predictability for Efficient Agent-Native LLM Serving
  2. 2026TokenDance: Scaling Multi-Agent LLM Serving via Collective KV Cache Sharing
  3. 2026MemMux: Runtime Verification and Honest Resource Attribution for Fleets of Parallel Coding Agents
  4. 2025Astraea: A State-Aware Scheduling Engine for LLM-Powered Agents
  5. 2026AgentCgroup: Understanding and Controlling OS Resources of AI Agents
  6. 2025Gradientsys: A Multi-Agent LLM Scheduler with ReAct Orchestration
  7. 2026Hive: A Multi-Agent Infrastructure for Algorithm- and Task-Level Scaling
  8. 2026PeakBench: Benchmarking Resource-Aware Tool Invocation in LLM Agents