mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

When Informal Text Breaks NLI: Tokenization Failure, Distribution Shift, and Targeted Mitigations

arXiv 2604.16787 ↗First posted 18 Apr 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study how informal surface forms degrade NLI accuracy in ELECTRA-small (14M) and RoBERTa-large (355M) across four transforms applied to SNLI and MultiNLI: slang substitution, emoji replacement, Gen-Z filler tokens, and their combination. Slang substitution (replacing formal words with informal equivalents, e.g., "going to" -> "gonna", "friend" -> "homie") causes minimal degradation (at most 1.1pp): slang vocabulary falls largely within WordPiece coverage, so the tokenizer handles it without signal loss. Emoji replaces content words with Unicode characters that ELECTRA's WordPiece tokenizer maps to [UNK], destroying the input signal before any learned parameters see it (93.6% of emoji examples contain at least one [UNK], mean 2.91 per example). Noise tokens (no cap, deadass, tbh) are fully in-vocabulary but absent from NLI training data, consistent with the model assigning them inferential weight they do not carry. The two failure modes respond to different interventions: preprocessing recovers emoji accuracy by normalizing text before tokenization; augmentation handles noise by exposing the model to noise-bearing examples during training. A hybrid of both achieves 88.93% on the combined variant for ELECTRA on SNLI (up from 75.88%), with no statistically significant drop on clean text. Against GPT-4o-mini zero-shot, unmitigated ELECTRA is significantly worse on transformed variants (p < 0.0001); hybrid ELECTRA surpasses it across all SNLI variants and reaches statistical parity on MultiNLI.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Apr 2026.

Builds on

8 of 16 references.

References · 8

  1. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,682
  2. 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,847
  3. 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 1,006
  4. 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 876
  5. 2018Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Datacited by 671
  6. 2018Hypothesis Only Baselines in Natural Language Inferencecited by 295
  7. 2021Competency Problems: On Finding and Removing Artifacts in Language Datacited by 91
  8. 2019Inoculation by Fine-Tuning: A Method for Analyzing Challenge Datasetscited by 42

Built on by

Not cited yet.