Continuous transformations of probability measures and their transport representations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Given a function F transforming a probability measure μ into another one F(μ), we study the existence and regularity of a transport representation of it. That is, we ask whether we can represent the image F(μ) of the input probability measure μ as the push-forward of μ by a map f(·,μ) which may depend on μ; and furthermore, how regular f can be chosen depending on F. Even if F is continuous and a transport representative exists, it cannot necessarily be chosen in a continuous way; however, if F is Lipschitz continuous with respect to the Wasserstein distance, then f can be chosen continuous. We provide several examples to illustrate the sharpness of our assumptions. This question is motivated by approximation results for transformations of probability distributions with transformers.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Apr 2026.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Measure-to-measure Regression with Transformerscited by 1
- 2026Any-Dimensional Learning by Samplingcited by 1
- 2026Universal Approximation of Measure-to-Measure Operators by Pushforwardscited by 0
- 2026Universal Approximation of Measure-to-Measure Operators by Pushforwards28 Sep 2026
- 2026Any-Dimensional Learning by Sampling8 Jul 2026
- 2026Measure-to-measure Regression with Transformers27 May 2026