Sampling Matters: The Effect of ECG Frequency on Deep Learning-Based Atrial Fibrillation Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep learning models for atrial fibrillation (AF) detection are increasingly trained on heterogeneous electrocardiogram (ECG) datasets with varying sampling frequencies, yet the specific consequences of these discrepancies on model performance, calibration, and robustness remain insufficiently characterized. To address this, we conducted a systematic benchmark using 12-lead, 10-second recordings from the PTB-XL dataset, resampled to target frequencies of 62, 100, 250, and 500 Hz, to evaluate a standard 1-D Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and a hybrid CNN-Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) architecture under a rigorous patient-safe cross-validation framework. Our analysis reveals that sampling frequency significantly impacts detection metrics in an architecture-dependent manner; the hybrid CNN-LSTM model demonstrated optimal performance and consistent calibration at intermediate frequencies (100-250 Hz), whereas the 1-D CNN baseline exhibited marked degradation in accuracy and sensitivity at 500 Hz, suggesting increased susceptibility to high-frequency noise. We conclude that ECG sampling frequency is a critical, underappreciated factor in arrhythmia detection, and future foundation models must explicitly control for temporal resolution to ensure clinical reliability and reproducibility.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Apr 2026.
Builds on
3 of 18 references.
References · 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.