Brain-CLIPLM: Semantic Compression for EEG-to-Text Decoding
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Decoding natural language from non-invasive electroencephalography (EEG) remains constrained by low signal-to-noise ratio and limited information bandwidth. This raises a central question: can sentence-level language be reliably recovered from such signals? Under realistic information constraints, this direct-recovery assumption may be too strong. We introduce a semantic compression hypothesis: non-invasive EEG may preserve recoverable semantic anchors rather than the full lexical--syntactic form of a sentence. From this perspective, direct sentence reconstruction is overly fine-grained relative to the recoverable information scale of EEG. To address this mismatch, we propose Brain-CLIPLM, a two-stage framework that decomposes EEG-to-text decoding into semantic-anchor recovery and anchor-guided sentence reconstruction. Stage 1 uses contrastive learning to align word-level EEG evidence with a fixed keyword vocabulary and recover ordered semantic anchors. Stage 2 uses a retrieval-grounded large language model with chain-of-thought reasoning prompts to reconstruct sentence meaning from these anchors, following a granularity matching principle that aligns decoding complexity with the recoverable neural information scale. On the combined Zurich Cognitive Language Processing (ZuCo) benchmark, Brain-CLIPLM achieves 67.6% Top-5 and 85.0% Top-25 sentence retrieval accuracy, with the strongest performance at intermediate anchor granularity. Control analyses show that EEG-derived anchors carry sentence-specific information beyond language-model priors. Within the constrained ZuCo sentence pool and fixed keyword-vocabulary settings, these findings suggest that EEG-to-text decoding is better framed as recovering compressed semantic content before anchor-guided sentence reconstruction.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Mar 2026.
Builds on
12 of 42 references.
References · 12
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
- 2021Open Vocabulary Electroencephalography-To-Text Decoding and Zero-shot Sentiment Classificationcited by 67
- 2019ZuCo 2.0: A Dataset of Physiological Recordings During Natural Reading and Annotationcited by 65
- 2024Are EEG-to-Text Models Working?cited by 32
- 2024Enhancing EEG-to-Text Decoding through Transferable Representations from Pre-trained Contrastive EEG-Text Masked Autoencodercited by 15
- 2024Towards Linguistic Neural Representation Learning and Sentence Retrieval from Electroencephalogram Recordingscited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026SENSE: Efficient EEG-to-Text via Privacy-Preserving Semantic Retrieval
- 2026RAG-based EEG-to-Text Translation Using Deep Learning and LLMs
- 2024SEE: Semantically Aligned EEG-to-Text Translation
- 2025EEG2TEXT-CN: An Exploratory Study of Open-Vocabulary Chinese Text-EEG Alignment via Large Language Model and Contrastive Learning on ChineseEEG
- 2024BELT-2: Bootstrapping EEG-to-Language representation alignment for multi-task brain decoding
- 2026SYNAPSE: Neuro-Symbolic Visual Thought-to-Text Decoding via Topological Semantic Denoising
- 2025WaveMind: Towards a Conversational EEG Foundation Model Aligned to Textual and Visual Modalities
- 2025Interpretable EEG-to-Image Generation with Semantic Prompts